Trending December 2023 # Amd Catalyst 15.7 Drivers Add Pretty Much Every Feature Radeon Gamers Begged For # Suggested January 2024 # Top 18 Popular

You are reading the article Amd Catalyst 15.7 Drivers Add Pretty Much Every Feature Radeon Gamers Begged For updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Amd Catalyst 15.7 Drivers Add Pretty Much Every Feature Radeon Gamers Begged For

AMD’s polishing up software support for its new Fury X and Radeon R300 series graphics cards with the release of new WHQL-certified Catalyst 15.7 drivers. This sweeping update plays nicely with Windows 10, adds the clamored-for (and oft-delayed) CrossFire multi-GPU support for FreeSync monitors, and extends some of AMD’s formerly exclusive features (like frame rate target control) to the full range of older Radeon R200 series graphics cards.

The story behind the story: AMD is often criticized for failing to release new WHQL-certified drivers at the same blistering pace as Nvidia. That said, the abundance of new goodies enabled in Catalyst 15.7 proves that AMD can stay feature-competitive with the GeForce gang, even if those features are released at a slightly slower pace—and they’re sure to bring a smile to the faces of Radeon gamers everywhere.

What’s new in AMD’s Catalyst 15.7 drivers

The first of many improvements in the drivers is FreeSync support for CrossFire setups. AMD’s FreeSync (and Nvidia’s competing G-Sync) force your monitor and your graphics card to synchronize their refresh rates—hence the name—to provide a silky-smooth gaming experience free of screen-tearing and stuttering. Simply put, they rock.

The first FreeSync monitors rolled out in March, but without support for multi-GPU CrossFire setups. That was kind of a bummer: FreeSync rocks, but buying a FreeSync-compatible monitor essentially locks you into using Radeon-brand graphics cards for five to ten years. That makes it most appealing to AMD’s Team Red diehards—a.k.a., the very people most likely to be running a multi-GPU CrossFire setup. AMD had to cancel its initial plans to release CrossFire FreeSync support in April, stating “it’s now clear to us that support for AMD FreeSync monitors on a multi-GPU system is not quite ready for release”—but now it is. Hallelujah! (AMD dual-GPU configurations that pair an APU with a single discrete graphics card aren’t supported, however.)

More importantly for gamers with more modest setups, Catalyst 15.7 extends support for AMD’s nifty Virtual Super Resolution and Frame Rate Target Control technologies to a wider range of older hardware.

Virtual Super Resolution debuted with AMD’s feature-stuffed Catalyst Omega drivers last December, but it worked only with a handful of high-end graphics cards (the R9 285, R9 290, R9 290X, and dual-GPU R9 295X2), ostensibly due to the need for internal hardware scalers. Well, somebody at AMD must have figured out some software trickery, because VSR is now supported on those GPUs, the full range of new Radeon R300 series graphics cards, and all Radeon R7 260 and above GPUs, along with all A-series 7400K and above desktop GPUs. (Hallelujah!)

Frame Rate Target Control, on the other hand, appeared in the launch drivers for the Radeon R300 series graphics cards in June. This technology essentially lets you set a hard cap on your frame rates in games, which—as our extensive testing proved—can provide tangible, large benefits for both power and heat use when it’s enabled with titles that push a tremendous amount of frame anyway.

Power savings provided by enabling FRTC at various cap levels in BioShock: Infinite.

You're reading Amd Catalyst 15.7 Drivers Add Pretty Much Every Feature Radeon Gamers Begged For

New Mac Pro Mpx Modules Add Potent Amd Radeon W6000 Gpus

New Mac Pro MPX modules add potent AMD Radeon W6000 GPUs

Apple has released three new Mac Pro MPX graphics cards modules, bringing AMD’s latest GPUs to the desktop powerhouse. The new MPX modules will be available both for new Mac Pro orders amid the computer’s custom configurations, and as standalone kits for existing Mac Pro owners looking to add new GPU power to their machines.

Apple launched the MPX – or Mac Pro Expansion – module format alongside the latest-generation of Mac Pro back in 2023. Designed to make upgrading graphics more straightforward, each Mac Pro offers space for two modules along with auxiliary power connections for 300W or more of power for them.

In addition, along with the PCI Express x16 GPU connection, the modules have a secondary, card-edge connector. That has a further x8 PCIe lanes for Thunderbolt, routing DisplayPort video, and more, meaning that the GPU’s PCIe connection doesn’t have to share its bandwidth. Finally, the modules themselves have larger passive heat sinks, aiding with quieter cooling.

The three new options are based on the AMD Radeon Pro W6000-Series GPU. There’ll be a Radeon Pro W6800X MPX Module, a Radeon Pro W6800X Duo MPX Module, and finally a Radeon Pro W6900X MPX Module. They support Infinity Fabric Link, so that up to four GPUs – or two Duo modules – to connect at up to 84 GB/s per link, in each direction.

That 168 GB/s of bi-directional bandwidth is around five times faster than the PCIe bus would be. Apple will preconfigure the Infinity Fabric Link connection for factory orders with two W6000-Series modules, and include the connection separately for standalone kits.

Each of the W6000-Series GPUs has 32GB of GDDR6 memory. The Radeon Pro W6800X and W6900X can drive three of Apple’s Pro Display XDR displays, three 5K displays, or as many as six 4K displays.

With two W6800X Duo cards, the promise is up to 60 teraflops of graphics performance, combines with 128GB of memory. Mac Pro users will see up to 84-percent faster Octane X performance, and up to 23-percent faster DaVinci Resolve performance. There could be up to a 26-percent increase in frame rate for realtime 3D interaction in Macon Cinema 4D.

Meanwhile, there are also more ports, adding to the Mac Pro’s flexibility. Each of the new MPX modules has four extra Thunderbolt 3 ports, along with an HDMI 2 port. It means the Mac Pro can end up with as many as 12 Thunderbolt 3 ports, if its modules are maxed out.

As for the existing AMD Radeon Pro Vega II MPX Module and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo MPX Module, they’ll no longer be offered as new Mac Pro custom order configurations. However Apple will continue to offer them as a standalone kit for existing owners.

The Radeon Pro W6800X MPX Module is $2,400 on an otherwise base-spec new Mac Pro, while a pair is $5,200. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo MPX Module is $4,600 for a single, and $9,600 for two. Finally, a single Radeon Pro W6900X MPX Module is $5,600, and a pair is $11,600.

Amd Radeon Hd 6870: Amd Takes The Midrange Graphics Crown

AMD’s Radeon HD 6800 series has arrived, and the results speak for themselves: The Radeon HD 6870 is the midrange card to beat.

The Radeon HD 6870 is the larger, more capable member of AMD’s new 6800 series lineup (the other newcomer is the Radeon HD 6850). Priced at a respectable $239 (as of October 21, 2010), this midrange graphics card manages to outpace its closest relative–the Radeon HD 5850 ($279)–while doing minimal damage to your bank balance.

Models in the Radeon HD 6800 series offer a new chip architecture, code-named Barts. It’s a modified version of the chip architecture (dubbed Cypress) featured in the Radeon HD 5850 and 5870 graphics cards, cutting back on Cypress’s size but still delivering excellent performance. Be sure to check out Jason Cross’s expansive overview of the Radeon HD 6800 GPUs and their architecture, for a deep dive into what’s happening under the hood.

If you’re already familiar with AMD’s 5800 series of graphics cards, you’ll be right at home with the 6800-series cards. In addition to sporting a similar aesthetic design to its predecessors’, the Radeon HD 6870 comes equipped with AMD’s Eyefinity Technology, which allows you to drive up to three displays from a single card. The card has a pair of DVI ports (one dual-link and one single-link), an HDMI port, and two mini-DisplayPort connectors. The variety is admirable, but keep in mind that you’ll need a pair of mini-DisplayPort adapters.

At long last, AMD has also implemented HD3D, the company’s take on 3D–and its answer to nVidia’s GeForce 3D Vision. HD3D focuses on support for the Open Stereo 3D Initiative. Instead of creating dedicated hardware, HD3D promises support for a wide variety of methods, ranging from existing active-shutter or polarized glasses, to glasses-free 3D technologies that will eventually work their way to market.

Where performance is concerned, the Radeon HD 6870 made an impressive showing on synthetic benchmarks and in real-world games. Though results on synthetic benchmarks don’t necessarily reflect real-world performance, they do provide a useful idea of how a particular GPU stacks up against the competition. The HD 6870 maintained a consistent lead over the older Radeon HD 5850 in all of our synthetic tests. It’s a pleasure to see a card outperform another while costing about $40 less, but the results here are hardly surprising: The HD 6870 sports an improved tessellation engine and runs at a higher clock speed than the HD 5850, lending the smaller card more muscle in all the right places.

In actual game testing, the performance gap narrowed, but the HD 6870 still came out ahead. All tests were performed at resolutions of 1920 by 1200 and 1680 by 1050 with maximum available settings, and with antialiasing alternately enabled and disabled. The Radeon HD 5850 earned the better score on our Tom Clancy’s H.A.W.X. benchmark, but barely: The average difference of 6 frames per second doesn’t justify the $40 bump in price.

Where power utilization is concerned, the HD 6870 gobbles up a bit more energy when under load on our test bench–246 watts, versus the HD 5850’s 231 watts. But it’s more energy-efficient when idle, consuming 103 watts at rest versus the HD 5850’s 127 watts. Keep in mind that those totals take the entire system’s load into account, so your own measurements will vary; our test bench sports a power-hungry Intel Core i7 980X processor and its accompanying gargantuan heatsink.

In terms of relative power efficiency, the Radeon HD 5850 edged past the HD 6870 ever so slightly–but bear in mind that the 6870 keeps the idle power lower by about 30 watts.

Overall, this choice is a no brainer. AMD’s Radeon HD 5850 had a good run, but it’s outclassed by a newcomer that delivers superior performance, comparable power efficiency, and a lower price tag. A great card may be riding off into the sunset, but the Radeon HD 6870 is a very worthy successor.

Amd Catalyst Control Center Missing In Windows Computer

If you have an AMD graphics card, then you need the AMD Catalyst Control Center which is a part of the AMD Catalyst software engine that provides customization options to manage display settings. Reportedly, this component or control panel is missing for some PC users on their Windows computers. This post is intended to help in resolving this issue.

Below we have listed the common causes for this issue based on user reports.

Faulty or outdated graphics drivers

Corrupt AMD application installation files

Multiple AMD background processes

Outdated .NET Framework and DirectX

AMD Catalyst Control Center is missing

The AMD Catalyst Control Center communicates with your graphics card and provides tweaking options. If it is missing on your Windows computer, the suggestions we have presented below should help you resolve the issue on your system.

Update .NET Framework and DirectX

Update or Reinstall the AMD graphics driver

Install the AMD Catalyst Software Suite for AMD Radeon graphics

Before you begin, ensure that your Windows is updated to the latest version on your system. This implies applying all critical, recommended, and optional updates available.

1] Update .NET Framework and DirectX

These software are vital for almost any app you have installed on your computer and AMD Catalyst Control Center is no exception. So, make sure you install/update to the latest versions of both of these system components via the links below and see if that helps solve your problem.

Read: AMD Radeon software not opening

2] Update or Reinstall the AMD graphics driver

This solution requires you to update the AMD graphics driver on your system using any of the following methods.

If updating the driver does not resolve the issue, then you need to boot your system into Safe Mode and use the Display Driver Uninstaller utility to clean uninstall your AMD graphics driver. Once done, reboot your system to normal mode and install the latest graphics driver version available at the AMD graphics hardware website.

Read: Radeon Settings and Driver versions do not match

4] Install the AMD Catalyst Software Suite for AMD Radeon graphics

This applies if you previously have not installed the AMD Catalyst Control Center on your Windows 11/10 computer, or if the suggestions above didn’t resolve the issue. Generally, you may have to consider installing (or reinstalling) a graphics driver due to the following reasons:

The AMD Catalyst Driver is required on a new system build with a clean install of the operating system.

To perform a clean install of the AMD Catalyst Driver to resolve display issues, performance issues, or error messages that may be related to missing/corrupt files associated with the software (e.g. ‘MOM.Implementation’, ‘no compatible hardware found’, or ‘display driver is not compatible’).

A graphics card hardware upgrade requires a later version of the AMD Catalyst Driver to ensure compatibility and proper functionality.

When installing the AMD Catalyst Driver for the Windows operating system, the user must be logged on as an Administrator, or have administrator rights to complete the installation of the AMD Catalyst Driver.

To obtain the latest AMD Catalyst Driver, you can visit chúng tôi here or use the AMD Driver Autodetect utility to detect your AMD Radeon graphics card and Windows operating system. If there is a new driver, the tool will download it.

I hope this post helps you.

Now read: Fix Display problems on AMD Radeon video cards

How do I get AMD Catalyst Control Center?

Read: NVIDIA Control Panel missing on Windows

Is AMD Catalyst still being used?

Catalyst Control Center was discontinued or rather replaced by Radeon Software, a new driver and video settings system. So, AMD Catalyst Control Center is an old version of AMD’s GPU control software and drivers. If you have an AMD GPU you can update to the newer version (Adrenalin) which might not be compatible with some GPUs.

Read: AMD Catalyst Control Center cannot be started.

Best Cpu For Amd Radeon Rx 7900 Xtx In 2023

The RX 7900 XTX is AMD’s new flagship graphics card. The company revealed it just recently via a launch event. However, pairing this powerful GPU with a powerful CPU is essential to get the most out of it. But choosing a good CPU can be a problem as there are so many options in the market. Not to worry as we are here. We went through AMD and Intel’s latest and greatest; after due consideration, we have come up with five eligible options for you.

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Specifications

Here are the specs of the latest AMD flagship GPU, RX 7900 XTX:

SpecificationsRX 7900 XTXCompute Units 96RDNA 3 Cores 6,144Game Clock (GHz) 2.3Memory 24 GB GDDR6Memory Bus 384-bitInfinity Cache 96MBTotal Board Power (Watt) 335Price (MSRP) $999

Best CPU for AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

There is only a handful of CPUs capable of complementing a powerful GPU like the new RX 7900 XTX. So, here are our picks for the best CPU for AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.


AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

AMD has also improved the IPC of its CPU architecture by 13%. So, the flagship 7000 series chip delivers improved performance in multiple areas and if you pair it with the latest AMD flagship GPU, expect nothing but unparalleled performance.

Cores: 16

Base Speed: 4.5 GHz

Boost Speed: 5.7 GHz

Cache: 64MB

Socket: AMD Socket AM5


Intel Core i9-13900K (Latest Gen) Gaming Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics – Unlocked

Cores: 24

Base Speed: 3 GHz

Boost Speed: 5.8 GHz

Cache: 36MB

Socket: Intel Socket 1700

Hands down, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is not only a For AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX but a great CPU in general. This 7000 series CPU’s performance is exceptional. It performs 26% better than the Ryzen 9 5000 series. Most importantly, the Ryzen 9 7900X is also available at a far cheaper price.


AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X 12-Core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

Cores: 12

Base Speed: 4.7 GHz

Boost Speed: 5.6 GHz

Cache: 64MB

Socket: AMD Socket AM5

This is another of Intel’s top-selling CPUs. The Intel Core i7-13700K has a single-thread rating of 4,347 and a CPU mark score of 34,431. Just based on these scores, Intel Core i7-13700K is one of the most compatible companions for the RX 7900 XTX. This time also Intel didn’t prioritise Raptor Lake’s performance, but the company did improve its design.


Intel Core i7-13700K (Latest Gen) Gaming Desktop Processor 16 cores (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores) with Integrated Graphics – Unlocked

Cores: 16

Base Speed: 3.4 GHz

Boost Speed: 5.4 GHz

Cache: 30MB

Socket: Intel Socket 1700

The Ryzen 5 7600X is the cheapest option on this list. But being cheap doesn’t mean it can’t handle the power of the flagship RX 7900 XTX GPU. The 7600X comes with great performance at a mid-range price that offers 18% faster gaming performance than the older generation. The CPU also has 25% and 34% increases in single-thread and multi-thread performance, respectively.


AMD Ryzen™ 5 7600X 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

Cores: 6

Base Speed: 4.7 GHz

Boost Speed: 5.3 GHz

Cache: 32MB

Socket: AMD Socket AM5

What are the Qualities of a Powerful CPU?

CPU or Central Process Unit is the brain of a computer and that makes them the most complex chipsets in the machine. Certain factors make a CPU powerful, and they are as follows…

The Core and Thread Count

Most users have no idea about the core and thread count of a CPU. The number is always right on the box, and they are the most important number that measures the power of a CPU. A CPU with more core and thread count will work faster and better at multitasking. You may be wondering, why focus on multitasking?

Well, multitasking is most important as modern-day PCs run a lot of tasks in the background. The CPU has to do a lot of complex processing and feed information to different components and other stuff properly. So, the CPU needs to be capable of multitasking, otherwise, it will slow your system down. So your CPU has to be good enough to keep up.

Core CPU Speed

Another point of consideration is the Core CPU Speed. The performance of the CPU is dependent on the speed of the CPU core. The core speed measures how many instruction cycles a CPU can complete in a second.

After a CPU completes an instruction cycle, the task gets executed. In this day and age, a CPU has to execute probably billions of instructions every second just to keep up. So, a CPU with faster core speed means it will go through more instructions every second.

Instructions Per Clock

IPC or Instructions per clock is a different sort of measurement. IPC is linked to the nm process of each CPU, meaning the size of the transistor inside the CPU. Transistors are basic Yes/No logic gates. They are combined to process information of more complexity.

Enjoy an Unparalleled Gaming Experience with AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

It seems like the GPU race for this year has begun. Nvidia started with RTX 4090 which is a giant, power-hungry GPU and now, AMD has joined in. let’s see who wins the race. But for now, if you are getting ready for the upcoming AMD flagship GPU, we got you covered. You can get any one of the processors from our best CPU for AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX list and expect a great gaming performance. They certainly won’t let you down.

Amd Radeon Rx 7900 Xtx Vs. Radeon 6900 Xt: Battle Of The Generations

That’s the cool thing about last-generation GPUs. The new AMD cream of the crop has not obsoleted the older gen, not by a long shot. GPUs such as the 6900 XT remain potent, and in many cases, can prove to be excellent price-to-performance warriors. The refreshed AMD 6950 XT added a few percentage points to the mix, too. With AMD putting the 6000-series GPUs on sale, is it enough to draw you away from the breakneck performance of the 7000 series to save a few bucks? 

Radeon RX 6900 XT

Read our review

Best Prices Today:

We’re going to retroactively look at the big guy from last generation—the 6900 XT—and the 7900 XTX of this generation. They were both the fastest and top AMD GPUs on release. Keeping in mind the 7900 XT and 6950 XT also exist, we’ll keep the attention on the OG “original” top dogs. 

AMD 6900 XT vs. AMD 7900 XTX: Price and availability 

Thiago Trevisan

Both GPUs debuted at a $999 MSRP. This makes them impressive—since comparable Nvidia GPUs are priced higher, such as the RTX 3090 and RTX 4080. 

Recently, AMD has dropped the price of the older 6900 XT to as low as $629 to make way for the 7900 XTX. (You can even pick up the 6950 XT for under $700, too.)  

They have another shared attribute, this time concerning availability. The 6900 XT came during a very turbulent time of the GPU shortages, making it rarely available at MSRP. Thanks to an ease in the GPU market, it’s easily found in stock now.

Neither the 6900 XT nor the 7900 XTX have had ideal launch and availability conditions for most of their existence. If you were to purchase today, you’d more easily find the older 6900 XT for cheaper in stock. 

Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Read our review

As we’ll find out, the 7900 XTX has an impressive performance uplift if you consider both GPUs at their original $999. That MSRP has stayed the same, unlike the RTX 4080, which has crept up. If we compare the current $629 6900 XT price, however, you’re certainly paying more for each frame by a similar dollar amount as of today. 

Considering the above, we’d say the 7900 XTX is one of the better performance values you can get today, for those seeking the most frames. If you can do with a bit less performance, the 6900 XT is still a good value. 

AMD 6900 XT vs. AMD 7900 XTX: Performance

Thiago Trevisan

Performance is the dueling ground where the real questions will be answered concerning these two contenders. 

Keep another important performance issue in mind: CPU choice. With the 7900 XTX reaching such high frame rates, your CPU choice will become even more of a factor in some games. Just as the RTX 4090 can have CPU bottlenecks at even 4K, the 7900 XTX will be much more demanding. Meaning you’re likely able to skate by with a fast—but not “fastest” CPU—such as the 6900 XT without as much bottlenecking. 

From PCWorld’s RX 7900 XTX review.

Brad Chacos

With Cyberpunk 2077 (ray tracing and DLSS/FSR off), the 7900 XTX is one of the most impressive GPU’s we’ve seen. It even puts up a domineering effort against the Nvidia RTX 4090, which is quite the feat! 

We also see the 6900 XT with very close performance to the RTX 3090, but far from the 7900 XTX. If this was your game of choice, the latter’s performance is around 63 percent better on paper. Oddly enough, the price difference between $629 and $999 for both GPUs currently stands around 58 percent. While you’re getting tremendous performance increases, the price is similarly higher. You’ll have to ask yourself if you’re fine with the acceptable 91 FPS at 1440p for Cyberpunk, or if you need more (such as 4K, and ray tracing, where the answer favors the 7900 XTX). 

There is no doubt that when comparing their original $999 MSRP, instead of the cheaper current price of the 6900 XT, the performance gains make the 7900 XTX a better choice. But at current prices, it’s a bit more of a toss-up.

In looking at the lower-priced 7900 XT, the price-to-performance difference falls in favor of the 6900 XT, as the $899 7900 XT lacks the same oomph as its bigger XTX brother (but doesn’t lack the high pricing). 

From PCWorld’s 7900 XTX review.

Brad Chacos

With Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, we find a game that likes AMD hardware in general. The 6900 XT is putting up impressive numbers still—even at 4K it’s able to go above the magical 4K 60 FPS barrier. At 1440p, once again we see the 7900 XTX with nearly a 60 percent gain over the 6900 XT. 

That is incredible—but once again you must ask yourself if the 123 FPS of the 6900 XT at 1440p is insufficient. Chances are, it will do you just fine, and you’re paying much less. 

From PCWorld’s 7900 XTX review.

Brad Chacos

Returning to Cyberpunk 2077, we now see how ray tracing fares. AMD has made some impressive improvements to its ray-tracing performance in the 7900 XTX, although it’s still behind Nvidia. 

In most cases, ray tracing is where you’ll likely also want to pair FSR to ensure you’re getting playable frame rates. With FSR balanced, you’re getting over 50 percent better ray-tracing performance with the 7900 XTX over the 6900 XT. With FSR off, that number climbs slightly closer to 60 percent, where the brute force of the 7900 XTX plays a bigger role. You will get less FPS with it off, and sometimes low enough to be unplayable with ray tracing. 

The story with ray tracing is oddly like regular rasterized performance differences between both GPUs. In both cases, the 7900 XTX performs more than 50 percent higher. 

If your primary goal is ray tracing, chances are you’ll be better served on the Nvidia side. Otherwise, you’re likely paying similarly for that performance increase on the 7900 XTX versus the 6900 XT. 

AMD’s FSR technology is a great performance feature on both GPUs, and they’ll be further augmented by the eventual release of FSR 3. 

In the performance conclusion, if you’re okay with the $999 price, the clear choice is the much faster 7900 XTX. It’s one of the few decent “bang-for-buck” GPUs nowadays, even at its current price. If you’re okay with some compromises in frames, the $629 6900 XT has more than enough chops to handle demanding games. 

AMD 6900 XT vs. AMD 7900 XTX: Power and other things to know

As we’re talking about the leading performers from AMD, efficiency isn’t always the first talking point. While AMD has heavily pushed its relative efficiency in the past, Nvidia has certainly showcased some impressive numbers, too. 

Brad Chacos

With a 355W TDP on the 7900 XTX and a tamer 300W on the 6900 XT, they’re both reasonable. Remember, the RTX 4090 has a whopping 450W TDP, albeit with more performance. 

This means that typically you’ll have an easier time cooling and fitting these AMD GPUs in your system. AMD made a point initially that these are “normal-sized” and use the regular PCIe 8-pin adapters compared to Nvidia’s 12VHPWR solution. While that is true, some AIB third-party coolers such as the PowerColor Red Devil can be just as massive! 

The 7900 XTX is even bigger than the RTX 4080.

Thiago Trevisan

Another important point to touch on is in driver support. While AMD has been much better in recent generations with driver updates, there have been some issues. For example, updated drivers for the 6900 XT were noticeably late after 7900 XTX drivers had already been released for some new game releases. That’s one thing to remember about buying the older GPU—you may have less frequent driver updates over time compared to the shiny new thing. 

AMD 6900 XT vs. AMD 7900 XTX: The verdict 

There is no doubt that, pound for pound, the 7900 XTX is impressive. If we consider that the $999 MSRP technically stayed the same versus the 6900 XT, it’s even more so. (We’re looking at you, RTX 4080!) 

We can find the 6900 XT at $629 today, however. And while it doesn’t have the door-busting performance of the 7900 XTX, it’s still competent in modern games. It’s also much easier to find in stock. You will be missing out on the top frame rates, and likely have insufficient ray-tracing performance. If you combine FSR and the upcoming FSR 3 with the 6900 XT, it will prolong the life of this GPU even more. 

Having said that, if you find a $999 7900 XTX, the performance gains are clearly worth it for many. You’ll enjoy 50 percent more frames in many games, including ray tracing, at the same original MSRP of the 6900 XT. 

Verdict: The 7900 XTX, albeit more expensive, is likely worth it over the 6900 XT currently, as it will give you longer usability and comes with tremendous performance gains.

Update the detailed information about Amd Catalyst 15.7 Drivers Add Pretty Much Every Feature Radeon Gamers Begged For on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!