Trending December 2023 # Google Pixel 5A Vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which One Should You Buy? # Suggested January 2024 # Top 13 Popular

You are reading the article Google Pixel 5A Vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which One Should You Buy? updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Google Pixel 5A Vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Eric Zeman / Android Authority

Google and Samsung are now both competing head-to-head in the upper mid-range segment. The Google Pixel 5a takes on Samsung’s established Galaxy A52 5G with a similar price and specs. However, the latter has many perks to offer Samsung fans, including longer security updates, a more versatile camera system, a slightly faster processor, and more. So which one should you consider buying? Let’s find out in this Google Pixel 5a vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G comparison.

Our verdict: Google Pixel 5a review

Newer versions of both devices have been announced. Samsung has recently launched the Galaxy A53, which features an upgraded processor, a bigger battery, and the latest version of Android. Read our full

Samsung has recently launched the Galaxy A53, which features an upgraded processor, a bigger battery, and the latest version of Android. Read our full Galaxy A53 review for more detailed information. Google has announced the Pixel 6a, which brings a faster chipset and a new design, among other things. However, the phone is not available yet — learn more here

Google Pixel 5a vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G


There are a couple of differences you’ll notice between the hardware on the Google Pixel 5a and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. For starters, Google has opted for a more premium metal unibody design this time around, compared to its predecessor’s plastic chassis. In contrast, Samsung sticks to the tried and tested polycarbonate frame and rear panel we also saw on the Galaxy A51.

When it comes to the overall look, the Pixel 5a is more attractive, in my opinion, with its forest green undertones and olive-colored power button. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G keeps things straightforward with solid, matte colors running across the entire body.

The Pixel 5a looks more attractive with its forest green undertones and olive-colored power button.

You’ll notice that the Galaxy A52 5G closely resembles its flagship family members with a chunky camera module and a centered punch-hole that houses the selfie snapper. It also comes with an in-display fingerprint sensor, so there’s nothing at the back except for the cameras and Samsung’s logo.

Meanwhile, the Pixel 5a is also not a giant leap design-wise compared to the Pixel 4a 5G, featuring the same square camera housing with a physical fingerprint sensor underneath it.

Durability was a bit of a concern with the Pixel 4a, but the Pixel 5a fixes that with its newly acquired IP67 rating for water and dust protection. That means the phone is on par with the Samsung Galaxy A52 in this area, which also has an IP67 rating.

Samsung’s phone, however, one-ups the Pixel in terms of display toughness. Google has equipped its phone with Gorilla Glass 3 protection on the 6.34-inch OLED display, while Samsung uses Gorilla Glass 5 on its slightly larger 6.5-inch AMOLED screen.

Related: The best budget camera phones you can buy

Meanwhile, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G sports a more versatile camera setup with a 64MP primary sensor, a 12MP ultrawide lens, and two 5MP snappers for dedicated macro and depth photos. Of course, the phone’s software skills and machine learning prowess are not as strong as what Google offers, but the phone still takes excellent images overall.

There are no zoom cameras here, but the phone relies on digital zoom for long-distance shots. That said, the 16MP binned photos from the primary sensor were quite good in our experience. Overall, we found that the device delivers ideal colors, details, white balance, and exposure. In terms of video shooting, the Galaxy A52 5G can only shoot 4K at 30fps compared to the Pixel 5a’s ability to record 4K footage at 60fps.

Price, availability, and colors

Jimmy Westenberg / Android Authority

Google Pixel 5a: $449

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: $499 / £399 / €429

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G launched for $499, but it has since reduced its price to exactly $239 for the 6GB RAM and 128GB storage version. That makes the phone a bit cheaper than the Pixel 5a, which comes in at $449 for the same configuration, although it’s currently on sale for as low as $384.

Google Pixel 5a vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which one should you buy?

If we had to choose one phone between the Google Pixel 5a and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, we would probably go for the Pixel. That’s because Google’s phone promises a stock Android experience, better cameras, Google’s three-year software update promise, and a solid design.

The Pixel 5a is our pick — but the Galaxy A52 5G is a very strong alternative.

However, keep in mind that there are also a few extra features on Samsung’s phone that you may find helpful — the 120Hz display and in-display fingerprint sensor. However, these are more cosmetic and should not make a massive difference to the phone’s overall performance compared to the Pixel 5a.

You're reading Google Pixel 5A Vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which One Should You Buy?

Samsung Galaxy S9 Vs Galaxy S9+: Which S9 Should You Buy?

Our Verdict

When compared to the Galaxy S9 the Plus model adds a telephoto camera, 2GB of RAM, a slightly larger screen and promises of extended battery life. It also comes at a £130/$120 premium, though you will notice this less when buying on a contract. If photography is your thing, or you will appreciate the extra screen room, buy the Galaxy S9+. Otherwise the more affordable Galaxy S9 should suit you just fine.

Samsung will charge you an extra £130/$120 for the  Galaxy S9+ over the  Galaxy S9 if you buy it SIM-free, so what do you get for your money? We break down the differences between Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+.


The new Galaxy S9 and S9+ are available to  pre-order today from £739/$719.99 and £869/$839.99 respectively, putting £130/$120 between them. The phones officially go on sale 16 March 2023, and we should see the price quickly drop within the next few months.  Check out the best Galaxy S9 deals here.


The display tech is the same across the Samsung Galaxy S9 line, but the Galaxy S9+ has a larger 6.2in panel while the Galaxy S8 is 5.8in. Both are Quad-HD+ 18.5:9 Super AMOLED screens.

Size and weight

Naturally, then, if it has a larger display the Galaxy S9+ is also going to be bigger and heavier than the Galaxy S9. The larger model adds 26g to the weight, about a centimetre to the height and half a centimetre to the width. You might not notice a difference in the hand, but side by side it will become apparent.


More space inside the chassis means more room for a battery. The Galaxy S9+ adds 500mAh to the 3000mAh cell you’ll find in the Galaxy S9, though don’t assume that means it will last longer.

Samsung claims slightly higher figures for the S9+ (an extra two hours of video playback and three hours talk time, for example), but remember that the larger screen will zap more juice and we won’t know for sure until we’ve had both in our lab for thorough testing.


Though both Galaxy S9 models are fitted with either the Snapdragon 845 or Exynos 9810, depending on your territory, the Galaxy S9+ has an extra 2GB of RAM over the Galaxy S9. This should translate to faster performance in benchmarks, and improved multitasking functionality, but in reality you’re unlikely to notice a huge difference: either model is probably going to be the fastest phone you’ve ever seen.


We’ve saved it until last, but the camera is the key difference between Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+. Whereas the Galaxy S9 has an enhanced 12Mp ‘Super Speed Dual Pixel’ single-lens camera over its predecessor, the Galaxy S9+ also has this and adds a secondary telephoto lens, with both supporting optical image stabilisation.

The second camera is a 12Mp telephoto lens with a 1/3.4in sensor and 1.0um pixels. It allows the Galaxy S9+ to build on the 8x digital zoom of the standard model with 10x digital zoom and 2x optical zoom, and adds support for Live Focus with bokeh filters.

The primary 12Mp cameras that feature on both models have 1/2.55in sensors and 1.4um pixels, and each supports the new Dual Aperture f/1.5-f/2.4 capabilities (this is nothing to do with the second lens).

Also see:  Best Galaxy S9 cases

Galaxy S9 vs Galaxy S9+ specifications

SpecificationsSamsung Galaxy S9Samsung Galaxy S9+Price£739£869Operating systemAndroid Oreo 8.0 with TouchWizAndroid Oreo 8.0 with TouchWizProcessor2nd-gen 10nm, 64-bit Octa-core processor (2.7GHz Quad + 1.7GHz Quad)2nd-gen 10nm, 64-bit Octa-core processor (2.7GHz Quad + 1.7GHz Quad)RAM4GB RAM6GB RAMStorage64GB with microSD support up to 400GB64GB with microSD support up to 400GBDisplay5.8in Quad HD + Curved Super AMOLED, 18.5:9 (570ppi)6.2in Quad HD + Curved Super AMOLED, 18.5:9 (529ppi)Body147.7mm x 68.7mm x 8.5mm158.1mm x 73.8mm x 8.5mmWeight163g189gSensorsIris, pressure, accelerometer, barometer, fingerprint, gyro, geomagnetic, hall, HR, proximity, RGB lightIris, pressure, accelerometer, barometer, fingerprint, gyro, geomagnetic, hall, HR, proximity, RGB lightPortsUSB-CUSB-CConnectivityWi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, GPSWi-Fi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, GPSAudioAKG tuned stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos tech, 3.5mm headphone jackAKG tuned stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos tech, 3.5mm headphone jackCamera12Mp camera, f/1.512Mp dual-camera, f/1.5, dual-OISBattery3000mAh, 15W Adaptive Fast Charging, fast wireless charging3500mAh, 15W Adaptive Fast Charging, fast wireless chargingWaterproofingIP68IP68Extra featuresAR Emoji, Bixby AI, iris scanner, face recognitionAR Emoji, Bixby AI, iris scanner, face recognition

Specs Samsung Galaxy S9: Specs

Android 8.0 Oreo

5.8in Quad HD+ (2960×1440) 18.5:9 SuperAMOLED Infinity Display

Exynos 9810 octa-core processor


64GB internal storage

microSD card slot (up to 400GB)

12Mp rear-facing camera with OIS and f/1.5

8Mp front camera

Pressure sensitive home button

Fingerprint scanner (rear mounted)

Heart rate monitor

11ac dual-band Wi-Fi

Bluetooth 5.0 with aptX



4G LTE Cat 16

Headphone jack


3000mAh non-removable battery

Wireless charging

IP68 dust & waterproof rating



Google Pixel 7A Vs Pixel 5A: Should You Upgrade To The Latest Pixel?

Want to make a quick purchase decision? Here’s a quick rundown of the key differences between the Pixel 7a and Pixel 5a.

The Pixel 7a sports a slightly smaller 6.1-inch display vs the Pixel 5a’s 6.34 inches.

The older Pixel 5a weighs considerably lesser than the Pixel 7a, even though it sports a larger build.

Unlike prior Pixel A-series phones, the Pixel 7a’s display features a smoother 90Hz refresh rate.

The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 chip is significantly faster than the 5a’s Snapdragon 765G. The newer phone also packs an additional 2GB of RAM, taking the total up to 8GB.

The new design of the Pixel 7a leaves no place for a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner. The sensor is now placed under the display instead.

With its new 64MP primary sensor and upgraded ultrawide lens, the Pixel 7a’s cameras are far superior to the ones on the Pixel 5a.

Google has added wireless charging to the Pixel 7a, a first for Google’s A-series Pixel smartphones.

The Pixel 7a lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, which was included on the Pixel 5a.

Keep reading to know more about how the Pixel 7a differs from the Pixel 5a, including in more areas like connectivity and ergonomics.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 5a: Specs

The Pixel 5a will not get software updates beyond 2024. The Pixel 7a has five years of support ahead of it.

Finally, let’s talk about software. The Pixel 5a will turn two years old later this year. That puts it on track to get just one more year’s worth of updates, including security patches. This is because the Pixel 5a was the last Google phone in history to receive just three years of updates.

Modern Pixel devices now enjoy five years of support, with three major software updates and an additional two years of security patches. So if you pick up a Pixel 7a, you won’t have to worry about your phone’s security until 2028. That’s a long support commitment and makes the Pixel 7a look extremely future-proof when compared to the Pixel 5a.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 5a: Size comparison

You also get a host of new software features that make the Pixel 7a’s camera significantly better from a less obvious perspective. Features like Real Tone and faster Night Sight make the imaging experience far more consistent from shot to shot. The older phone missed out on most of these Pixel-exclusive features as Google’s semi-custom Tensor G2 chip does a lot of heavy lifting. The same applies to the selfie camera, which also got a resolution bump from 8MP to 13MP.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 5a: Battery and charging

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Battery life hasn’t ever been a strong point of the Pixel series. However, the Pixel 5a’s efficient Snapdragon 765G chip paired with a decently-sized battery translated to some of the best endurance we ever saw on a Google phone. During our review period, we found that the phone could make it through a full day with over half of its charge still intact. That’s phenomenal runtime from any smartphone, Pixel or otherwise.

Unfortunately, Google’s winning streak in the battery life area was rather short-lived. The Pixel 7a has returned to the series’ average, providing just enough battery life to satisfy casual users. You can thank the flagship-grade Tensor G2 chip here as it’s far more power-hungry than the Pixel 5a’s Snapdragon 765G. Likewise, the new 90Hz display is a welcome usability improvement, but it comes at a power and battery cost.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 5a: Price

Pixel 5a: Starts at $449

Pixel 7a: Starts at $499

When the Pixel 5a launched in 2023, Google increased the starting price relative to its predecessor from $349 to $449. However, that generation brought a host of improvements like 5G support, a larger battery, and IP67 protection. In many ways, the Pixel 5a was the spiritual successor to the Pixel 4a 5G rather than the base Pixel 4a. With that context in mind, the Pixel 5a’s $449 price was actually lower than the Pixel 4a 5G’s $499 tag.

With the release of the Pixel 7a this year, Google has returned to that $499 price point. But with so many upgrades in tow, we believe that the 11% upcharge is justified. It’s still rather affordable in the context of other mid-range smartphones. But if you’re still not looking to spend that much, the last-gen Pixel 6a will stay on shelves for just $349.

Would you upgrade from the Pixel 5a to the Pixel 7a?

161 votes

Ultimately, you’ll have to decide whether the Pixel 7a’s new features justify the price of admission. From looking at the spec sheet alone, it looks like one of the biggest year-over-year upgrades the series has ever seen. But if you’re currently using the Pixel 5a and don’t feel the urge to get a new phone, you can always wait for the final software update and re-evaluate next year. Will you make the switch? Let us know in the poll above.


No, the Pixel 7a has taken a step back in battery life compared to the Pixel 5a. However, it should last the average user most days of use.

If you’re upgrading from an older A-series Google smartphone like the Pixel 5a, the Pixel 7a is worth upgrading to. It offers a range of hardware improvements along with much longer software support.

Review Del Samsung Galaxy A52 5G


Excelente pantalla AMOLED de 120 Hz

Cámara decente con OIS

Clasificación IP67


Relación calidad-precio

Sensor de huellas mejorable

Diseño con partes de plástico

Nuestro veredicto

El Galaxy A52 se centra en los pequeños detalles, con una sorprendente pantalla AMOLED de 120 Hz, una clasificación IP67, cámara con estabilización de imagen OIS y la promesa de 4 años en actualizaciones de seguridad.

Durante años, Samsung ha sido el dominador claro de los fabricantes de smartphones más premium que corren con Android OS. Su prestigiosa serie Galaxy S ha sido la gran triunfadora durante mucho tiempo, algo que pronto se trasladó a la gama media de terminales. 

Dentro de esta gama de precios nos llega para analizar el Galaxy A52 5G, una de las últimas apuestas de la firma con las que pretende satisfacer la demanda de usuarios que reclaman calidad a precio competitivo sin que esto suponga acabar con sus ahorros. 

Con una pantalla rápida y vibrante, una cámara principal decente y una calidad de construcción sólida, el Samsung Galaxy A52 5G se comporta francamente bien dentro de la mayoría de las funciones básicas. Veamos el análisis a fondo.

Diseño y calidad

El Galaxy A52 5G no destaca por presentar un diseño sobresaliente, pero aún así, se aprecian ciertos matices heredados de la gama Galaxy de Samsung, como es la disposición de las lentes de sus cámaras traseras, que mantienen la línea más novedosa de este 2023. 

El frontal con protección Gorilla Glass 5 se combina con un marco de metal brillante que contrasta con el acabado mate del panel trasero, dejando atrás el uso de materiales con efecto de vidrio, esos en los que las huellas dactilares resultan tan llamativas. 

El teléfono se siente sólido en la mano sin llegar a ser de los más ligeros del mercado, ya que su peso asciende a los 189 gramos. Es interesante ver una clasificación IP67 de protección al polvo y a líquidos, uno de los primeros aspectos que suele desaparecer al reducir el precio. 

Sorprendentemente, también contamos con un conector para auriculares de 3,5 mm en la parte inferior del teléfono, junto al puerto USB-C y frente a uno de los dos altavoces estéreo integrados. 


El Samsung Galaxy A52 5G no es un teléfono que destaque en diversos apartados. Sin embargo, si tuviera que nombrar uno, está claro que sin duda alguna sería su espectacular pantalla.

Incorpora el tipo de panel Super AMOLED vibrante de 6,5 pulgadas con el que Samsung se ha fraguado una gran reputación, junto con una resolución Full HD+, un brillo máximo de 800 nits y una frecuencia de actualización de 120 Hz que destaca en esta gama de precios. 

Pero hay una consideración que conviene tener en cuenta, como es la falta de soporte de transmisión en HDR. A pesar de esta omisión, el contenido de vídeo se ve francamente bien sobre un panel tan vibrante.

El cristal del panel ahora es totalmente plano frente a lo que Samsung nos tenía acostumbrados en el pasado, lo cual no le sienta nada mal ya que la ausencia de bordes convierten al teléfono en un modelo más manejable en el día a día. 

Con una relación de pantalla-cuerpo del 84,1 %, los biseles del Galaxy A52 5G no son los más delgados que encontrarás dentro de los móviles de gama media, pero son lo suficientemente delgados como para no distraer la visualización de contenido. 

Con respecto al anillo que tiene la cámara frontal perforada en la pantalla, cabe destacar que podría ser menos llamativa y de menor tamaño. Es un punto a mejorar y que ya hemos visto en otros modelos como el Poco F3.

El sensor de huellas dactilares tampoco destaca por garantizar una alta eficiencia, con procesos de desbloqueo algo lentos y poco fiables para nuestro gusto frente a lo que puedes encontrar en otros modelos de móviles de nueva generación. 

Especificaciones y rendimiento

Samsung ha mejorado con éxito las especificaciones del nuevo A52 al incluir en su último teléfono de gama media un procesador más potente que en ocasiones anteriores. Como uso generalizado, el terminal se desenvuelve francamente bien. 

En su interior, el chips Snapdragon 750G como mejora frente al uso del Exynos 9611 del Galaxy A51, aunque todavía sin llegar a impresionar. De hecho, se queda atrás en rendimiento frente a lo que ofrecen otros de precio similar. 

Por citar un ejemplo, el OnePlus Nord corre con un Snapdragon 765G con el que conseguimos registrar entre un 20 y un 30 % más de velocidad de fotogramas en nuestro grupo de pruebas basadas en GFXBench. 

Por su parte, un dispositivo como el Poco F3 que corre con un Snapdragon 870 todavía más rápido, obtuvo una puntuación dos o tres veces más alta en estas mismas pruebas. 

Como verás en las gráficas de rendimiento, Genshin Impact en el A52 5G se establece por defecto en configuraciones bajas desde el principio. Puedes forzar esos ajustes a ‘Alto y 60 fps’, pero el resultado es extremadamente lento y entrecortado. 

El Poco F3, en comparación, está predeterminado en ‘Medio’ y se puede subir a ‘Alto / 60 fps’ con resultados perfectamente asumibles en gráficos. Y en términos de rendimiento puro de la CPU, una puntuación de 1886 multinúcleo de Geekbench 5 coloca al A52 5G ligeramente por detrás del OnePlus Nord y del Poco F3.

La mayoría de las personas no compararán el rendimiento del Galaxy A52 5G de manera tan directa, por supuesto, y en el uso general, funciona bien. La pantalla de 120 Hz de Samsung se siente fluida al desplazarte por los menús como ninguna otra de su categoría. 

También obtienes con su configuración valores de RAM de 6 u 8 GB, por lo que cambiar entre aplicaciones abiertas, en multitarea o ejecutadas en segundo plano, tampoco son un problema para el Galaxy A52 5G. 

Solo aquellos usuarios que hayan usado previamente teléfonos más premium, podrán notar la diferencia. Pero para la mayoría de las personas, y en la mayoría de los escenarios, esto no será un problema 

Al fin y al cabo, no estamos comprando todo un modelo buque insignia. Pero el Poco F3 obtiene un rendimiento notablemente mejor de una versión mejorada del chip líder del año pasado, y lo hace por unos 70 € menos que el Galaxy A52 5G.


Hoy en día, el apartado de fotografía es algo que puedes abordar con cualquier teléfono móvil inteligente en mejor o peor medida. Sin embargo, los resultados que obtienes con los modelos buque insignia no son comparables con la gama media, a menos que tengas un modelo Google Pixel. 

Sin embargo, aunque la cámara del Samsung Galaxy A52 5G no coincide con el aplomo de apuntar y disparar del Google Pixel 4a, sí da buena cuenta de los resultados decentes que puedes conseguir.

En particular, su sensor principal de 64 MP captura tomas brillantes y razonablemente detalladas con la gama de colores ligeramente potenciada que ya forma parte de la marca Samsung. Te guste o no, el Galaxy A52 los representa bien.

En comparación con otros como el Poco F3, que usamos uno al lado del otro durante nuestras pruebas, las tomas del Galaxy A52 5G son mucho más brillantes y, en general, mejores ofreciendo detalles finos. 

Samsung a menudo también logra rescatar más detalles en situaciones de HDR, aunque la compensación puede ser la extraña escena hiperreal o sobreexpuesta. En ciertos escenarios, la cámara del Galaxy A52 5G va demasiado lejos con un procesamiento contundente. 

Por ejemplo, cuando retratamos una pizza recién salida del horno, el móvil de Samsung hizo que toda la escena se viera especialmente amarilla alejándose del aspecto real, mientras que el modelo Poco F3 la capturó en todo su esplendor. 

Ya mencionamos que el Galaxy A52 5G incluye algunos detalles pequeños pero significativos, y uno de ellos es la inclusión de OIS. Esta tecnología de estabilización de fotos todavía no es un hecho en los teléfonos de gama media. 

Ni el Poco F3 ni el OnePlus 9 más caro la tienen, por ejemplo, aunque el OnePlus Nord sí. En cualquier caso, felicitaciones a Samsung por incluirlo en esta gama de precios, ya que es un extra bastante interesante de cara a conseguir mejores resultados. 

Gracias en parte a este OIS, el Galaxy A52 5G captura tomas nocturnas relativamente brillantes y claras. Ciertamente son más brillantes que las del Poco F3, con más detalles visibles en la oscuridad, aunque a cambio sufrirás de ciertos niveles de grano más obvios.

Del mismo modo, no son comparables los resultados del sensor ultra ancho de 12 MP del Galaxy A52 5G con un equivalente de buque insignia, pero las tomas que produce son decentes por el dinero que pagas. 

Para compararlo nuevamente con el Poco F3, las tomas ultra anchas del Galaxy A52 5G salieron mucho mejor, con detalles y exposición superiores, mucha menos suavidad hacia los bordes y una perspectiva considerablemente más amplia de 123 grados.

El Galaxy A52 5G captura bien los retratos, con un sujeto claramente delineado y un bokeh suave. Sin embargo, Samsung todavía necesita trabajar un poco en sus tonos de piel, ya que no se ven tan naturales como algunos de sus rivales.

Las selfies con la cámara frontal de 32 MP del teléfono también se ven bien, aunque los resultados son más borrosos que con la cámara principal. Ser capaz de tomar selfies más amplios también es bueno en teoría, pero la diferencia de perspectiva no es tan pronunciada.

Es una pena que Samsung cediera a las tendencias actuales de mejora de estadísticas y equipara su teléfono con un par de sensores superfluos de 5 MP, uno para asistir en la profundidad, y otro para tomas macro. 

Preferiríamos haberlo visto dedicar todo su esfuerzo y recursos considerables a esas dos cámaras principales, pero esa parece ser la tendencia del mercado actual. 

Lamentablemente, no hay un sensor de telefoto en el Galaxy A52 5G, pero el sensor principal de 64 MP de densidad de píxeles permite tomas 2x aceptables a través del recorte. Sin embargo, no recomendamos abusar del mismo.

Añade a todo este plantel grabaciones de vídeo en 4K / 30fps o 1080p / 60fps, y tendrás una cámara sólida pero poco espectacular. Una vez más, Samsung ha optado por la coherencia por encima de la calidad sobresaliente, lo cual parece ser una elección inteligente. 

Autonomía y carga rápida

La capacidad de la batería del A52 5G es de 4.500 mAh, y aunque no es un valor destacable frente a competidores que apuestas por las de 5.000 mAh, cabe decir que el terminal se comportó de manera eficiente.

Parece no afectarle para nada el hecho de que tenga que operar con un panel Super AMOLED cuya frecuencia de actualización escala a los 120 Hz, lo cual siempre representa un consumo extra. 

Es evidente que rara vez podrás superar los dos días de uso del mismo, salvo que uno de ellos hayas sido muy conservador con su uso, pero superarás el día completo sin problema alguno. 

Nuestra prueba de batería con PC Mark nos dio como resultado una puntuación de 11 horas y 3 minutos, colocando al al Galaxy A52 5G entre el Galaxy S21 (8:04) y el Galaxy S20 FE (12:35).

Ya con nuestras pruebas habituales logramos pasar de las 15 horas y media que se convierte en un día y medio de uso, con cuatro horas de pantalla a tiempo antes de que se activara el estado de bajo consumo del 15 %. Esto con la pantalla funcionando a 120 Hz. 

La carga rápida del A52 5G no es de las mejores dentro de su categoría, ya que la provisión de Samsung alcanza los 15 W, lejos de lo que ofrece la competencia que aquí aprieta con 30 W fácilmente superados por Xiaomi, Oppo o Realme. 

Esto nos deja unos tiempos de carga de un 31 % para una carga de media hora, lo cual no es nada especial para tratarse de un móvil de 2023, donde vemos como muchos teléfonos alcanzan su carga completa en poco más de una hora. 

Tampoco disponemos de opción de carga inalámbrica, algo que no suele ser habitual en modelos cuyo precio se encuentra por debajo de los 500 €, salvo que optes por el iPhone SE donde Apple lo clava en este apartado. 


El A52 5G viene con la capa de personalización One UI 3.1 de Samsung sobre Android 11.

El software de Samsung ha mejorado considerablemente desde tiempos atrás de TouchWiz, que en ocasiones se parecía a una especie de aplicación de ‘mi primer teléfono inteligente’ que podría usar para distraer a un niño pequeño. 

La compañía ahora muestra un toque considerablemente más ligero con sus esfuerzos de personalización, incluso en comparación con versiones anteriores de One UI, y efectos y animaciones mucho más modernas por las que recibe un alto grado de reconocimiento. 

Samsung Daily ha sido cambiado de su posición de la izquierda de la pantalla en favor de incluir Google Feed, que es un cambio para mejor. Sin embargo, no te equivoques, ya que One UI todavía presenta un frente ocupado. 

El asistente de Bixby todavía permanece ahí, listo para ser descubierto con una pulsación prolongada del botón de encendido, ya sin botón físico dedicado.

Constantemente me topé con una notificación que no se podía deslizar tratando de vincular nuestras cuentas de Samsung y Microsoft, lo cual era molesto. Las notificaciones también demostraron ser un poco inestables en el A52 5G.

Mientras tanto, obtienes una serie de aplicaciones preinstaladas que puede que desees o no, incluso aparte de la extensa lista de instalaciones opcionales. Eso incluye la aplicación de noticias Samsung Free, TikTok, Netflix y Microsoft OneDrive. 

No obstante, es mucho menos atroz que otras marcas. Incluso con su provisión de software, Samsung se las arregla para hacer un esfuerzo adicional. Cuatro años de actualizaciones de seguridad es una promesa que nadie debe ignorar.

Con todo, One UI es una interfaz rápida, fluida y manejable, la cual ofrece un amplio potencial de personalización.

Precio y disponibilidad

El Samsung Galaxy A52 5G se encuentra a la venta a un precio recomendado de 429 € para la configuración más básica siempre que sea 5G, ya que Samsung ofrece la posibilidad de adquirirlo sin 5G a un precio inferior de 349 €.

Esto lo coloca en el mercado de gama media, al doble del precio del Poco X3 NFC y a la mitad del precio del OnePlus 9 Pro. Los más contemporáneos puede que barajen otros modelos como el OnePlus Nord a 369 €, el Poco F3 a 329 €, el Google Pixel 4a a 389 € o el iPhone SE a 489 €.

En términos de lo que obtienes por lo que pagas, los dos últimos teléfonos no vienen con la conectividad 5G del Galaxy A52 5G. Por su parte, solo el Poco F3 coincide con la pantalla AMOLED de 120 Hz de Samsung. 

Pero todos esos teléfonos, excepto el Pixel 4a, te brindarán un rendimiento superior, y el teléfono de Google te brinda una mejor cámara. Con todo, el nuevo Galaxy A52 5G es una buena opción si estás pensando en consumir contenido en su pantalla. 


El Samsung Galaxy A52 5G ofrece un conjunto de características muy a la altura de un teléfono de gama media equilibrado y bien considerado. Su componente más destacado es la excelente pantalla Super AMOLED de 120Hz. 

Sin embargo, la impresión predominante es la de un teléfono que cubre todas las bases y presta atención a los detalles más pequeños. 

Aspectos como como una clasificación IP67, OIS para la cámara, un conector para auriculares de 3,5 mm y cuatro años de actualizaciones de seguridad pueden no ser tan atractivos como un cuerpo de vidrio y metal, pero suman para tener una configuración equilibrada. 

El rendimiento podría y quizás debería ser mejor, el sensor de huellas dactilares es curiosamente más inestable que la media, y este no es un diseño clásico de Samsung de todos los tiempos.

No obstante, la gente confía en Samsung por razones de peso y si cuentas con algo más de 400 € para gastarte en tu próximo teléfono móvil, la inclusión de 5G te garantizará el soporte de conectividad para beneficiarte de todo lo que está por llegar. 


Android 11 con una interfaz de usuario 3.1

Pantalla Super AMOLED de 6,5 pulgadas y FHD + 

Frecuencia de 120Hz con cristal plano

Sensor de huellas dactilares en pantalla

Gorilla Glass 5 (frontal)

Marco de plástico

Chip Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

RAM LPDDR4 de 6/8 GB

Almacenamiento de 128 / 256GB, ranura microSDXC


Principal de 64 MP, f / 1.8, 1 / 1.7X “con OIS

Ultra ancha de 12 MP, f / 2.2

Macro de 5 MP, f / 2.4

Profundidad de 5 MP, f / 2.4

Cámara frontal de 32 MP, f / 2.2

Vídeo de hasta 4K a 30 fps

Altavoces estéreo, Doble SIM

5G, wifi 802.11 a / b / g / n / ac y Bluetooth 5.0

Batería de 4500 mAh y carga de 15 W

Dimensiones de 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm

Peso de 189 gramos

Colores: Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue

Oneplus 10 Pro Vs Iphone 13 Pro: Which One Should You Buy?

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority

Each new flagship launch offers Android the chance to take on the best that iOS has to offer. Samsung started the year strong with its Galaxy S22 series, but now it’s time for OnePlus to have a go. The OnePlus 10 Pro reimagines the rear camera bump but offers the powerful internals you’d expect. Apple’s latest iPhone, on the other hand, makes a few key refinements to a successful formula. Does either one offer enough to make you switch operating systems? Let’s find out in this OnePlus 10 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro comparison.

Design and display

See also: Just how tough is Gorilla Glass?

If you were to hold the OnePlus 9 Pro and OnePlus 10 Pro in each hand, you might not know them apart. The 6.7-inch Fluid AMOLED display is exactly the same, right down to the waterfall edges and corner-mounted selfie camera. It’s a punch hole sensor, but it’s doubled in resolution from 16MP to 32MP. Otherwise, the display offers a 120Hz refresh rate, 1,300 nits of peak brightness, and a 20:9 aspect ratio.

Put up against the iPhone 13 Pro, the OnePlus 10 Pro offers plenty of extra real estate. The punch hole camera takes up less space than Apple’s notch, but the waterfall edges won’t be for everyone. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a suitable alternative if you need more screen space, but you’ll pay handsomely for it.

Hardware and cameras

See also: The best charging accessories

Price and colors

Apple iPhone 13 Pro (6/128GB): $999

Apple iPhone 13 Pro (6/256GB): $1,099

Apple iPhone 13 Pro (6/512GB): $1,299

Apple iPhone 13 Pro (6/1TB): $1,499

OnePlus 10 Pro (8/128GB): $899

OnePlus 10 Pro (12GB/256GB): TBC

The OnePlus 10 Pro with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage is more affordable than any iPhone 13 Pro model and offers a price cut over its predecessor. It starts at $899, a discount of $70 on the OnePlus 9 Pro with a matching configuration. We don’t have confirmed pricing for the 12GB and 256GB version in the US yet, but it would be hard to see it surpassing the iPhone 13 Pro with the same storage.

Apple’s smaller Pro model kicks off at a cool $999 for 128GB of storage, with 256GB raising the price by $100, while the jumps to 512GB and 1TB cost an extra $200 each. If you decide you want the iPhone 13 Pro Max, you can add $100 to those prices, starting at $1,099.

OnePlus 10 Pro

OnePlus 10 Pro

Great performance • Capable primary camera • Gorgeous display

MSRP: $799.99

Great performance and fast charging

The OnePlus 10 Pro has a brilliant display and offers long battery life along with fast charging that gets the battery from zero to full in about 35 minutes. The performance is solid and the main camera is quite good as well.

See price at Amazon



See price at Best Buy

See price at OnePlus

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

An extra camera lens and other perks up the ante for this model.

If you need something more capable than the vanilla iPhone 13, but don’t want an increase in size, this is the model for you.

See price at Best Buy

See price at Verizon

See price at AT&T

OnePlus 10 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro: Specs

Lastpass Vs. Keepass: Which One Should You Use In 2023?

There’s a better way. Password managers will keep track of them for you, and LastPass and KeePass are two popular, but very different choices. How do they compare? This comparison review has you covered.

LastPass is a popular password manager that’s easy to use and offers a workable free plan. Paid subscriptions add features, priority tech support, and extra storage. It’s primarily a web-based service, and apps are offered for Mac, iOS, and Android. Read our detailed LastPass review to learn more.

LastPass vs. KeePass: Head-to-Head Comparison

1. Supported Platforms

You need a password manager that works on every platform you use. LastPass fits the bill, and works with all major operating systems and web browsers:

Desktop: Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS,

Mobile: iOS, Android, Windows Phone, watchOS,

Browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari, Edge, Maxthon, Opera.

KeePass is different. The official version is a Windows app, and because it’s open-source, various individuals have been able to port it to other operating systems. Not all of these ports are of the same quality, and there are multiple options for each operating system, including:

5 for Mac,

1 for Chromebook,

9 for iOS,

3 for Android,

3 for Windows Phone,

3 for Blackberry,

1 for Pocket PC,

and more!

Those options can be confusing! There’s no easy way to know which version is best for you other than trying a few. When evaluating the app on my iMac, I used KeePassXC.

If you use KeePass on multiple devices, your passwords won’t be synced between them automatically. They’re stored in a single file, and you’ll have to sync that file using Dropbox or a similar service.

Winner: LastPass supports most popular platforms out of the box, while KeePass relies on ports by third parties.

2. Filling In Passwords

LastPass allows you to add passwords in a number of ways: by adding them manually, by watching you log in and learning your passwords one-by-one, or by importing them from a web browser or other password manager.

KeePass won’t learn your passwords as you type them, but it does allow you to add them manually or import them from a CSV (“comma-separated values”) file, a format most password managers can export to.

Some reviewers mentioned that the app can directly import from a number of other password managers, but the version I’m using doesn’t. KeePass can’t learn your passwords by watching you log in to websites.

Once you have some passwords in the vault, LastPass will automatically fill in your username and password when you reach a login page.

Once I found the right Chrome extension (in my case it’s KeePassXC-Browser), KeePass offered the same convenience. Prior to that, I found initiating a login directly from the app trickier and less convenient than other password managers.

Winner: LastPass. It lets you customize each login individually, allowing you to require that your master password be typed before logging into a site.

3. Generating New Passwords

Your passwords should be strong—fairly long and not a dictionary word—so they are hard to break. And they should be unique so that if your password for one site is compromised, your other sites won’t be vulnerable. Both apps make this easy.

LastPass can generate strong, unique passwords whenever you create a new login. You can customize the length of each password, and the type of characters that are included, and you can specify that the password is easy to say or easy to read, to make the password easier to remember or type when necessary.

KeePass will also generate passwords automatically and offers similar customization options. But you need to do this from the app rather than your browser.

Winner: Tie. Both services will generate a strong, unique, configurable password whenever you need one.

4. Security

Storing your passwords in the cloud may concern you. Isn’t it like putting all your eggs in one basket? If your account was hacked they’d get access to all your other accounts. LastPass takes steps to ensure that if someone does discover your username and password, they still won’t be able to log into your account.

You log in with a master password, and you should choose a strong one. For additional security, the app uses two-factor authentication (2FA). When you try to log in on an unfamiliar device, you’ll receive a unique code by email so you can confirm that it’s really you logging in.

Premium subscribers get additional 2FA options. This level of security is sufficient for most users—even when LastPass was breached, the hackers were not able to retrieve anything from users’ password vaults.

KeePass bypasses the concern of storing your passwords online by storing them locally, on your own computer or network. If you decide to use a syncing service like Dropbox to make them available on your other devices, choose one that uses security practices and policies you’re comfortable with.

Like LastPass, KeePass encrypts your vault. You can unlock it using either a master password, key file, or both.

Winner: Tie. LastPass takes strong security precautions to protect your data on the cloud. KeePass keeps your passwords securely encrypted on your own computer. If you need to synchronize them onto other devices, any security concerns now move to the syncing service you choose.

5. Password Sharing

Instead of sharing passwords on a scrap of paper or a text message, do it securely using a password manager. The other person will need to use the same one as you do, but their passwords will be automatically updated automatically if you change them, and you’ll be able to share the login without them actually knowing the password.

All LastPass plans allow you to share passwords, including the free one. The Sharing Center shows you at a glance which passwords you’ve shared with others, and which they’ve shared with you.

If you’re paying for LastPass, you can share entire folders and manage who has access. You could have a Family folder to which you invite family members and folders for each team you share passwords with. Then, to share a password, you’d just add it to the right folder.

KeePass takes an entirely different approach. It’s a multi-user application, so if you store your vault on a shared network drive or file server, others can access the same database using your master password or key file.

This isn’t as finely grained as with LastPass—you choose to share everything or nothing. You could create different password databases for different purposes, and only share your password for certain ones, but this is far less convenient than LastPass’s approach.

Winner: LastPass. It allows you to share passwords and (if you pay) folders of passwords with others.

6. Web Form Filling

Besides filling in passwords, LastPass can automatically fill in web forms, including payments. Its Addresses section stores your personal information that will be filled in automatically when making purchases and creating new accounts—even when using the free plan.

The same goes for the Payment Cards and Bank Accounts sections.

When you need to fill in a form, LastPass offers to do it for you.

KeePass can’t fill in forms by default, but third parties have created plugins that can. A quick search on the KeePass Plugins and Extensions page finds at least three solutions: KeeForm, KeePasser, and WebAutoType. I haven’t tried them, but from what I can tell, they don’t seem to do the job as conveniently as LastPass.

Winner: LastPass. It can fill in web forms natively and seems more convenient than KeePass’s form-filling plugins.

7. Private Documents and Information

Since password managers provide a secure place in the cloud for your passwords, why not store other personal and sensitive information there as well? LastPass offers a Notes section where you can store your private information. Think of it as a digital notebook that’s password-protected where you can store sensitive information such as social security numbers, passport numbers, and the combination to your safe or alarm.

You can attach files to these notes (as well as addresses, payment cards, and bank accounts, but not passwords). Free users are allocated 50 MB for file attachments, and Premium users have 1 GB. To upload attachments using a web browser you will have had to have installed the “binary enabled” LastPass Universal Installer for your operating system.

Finally, there’s a wide range of other personal data types that can be added to LastPass, such as driver’s licenses, passports, social security numbers, database and server logins, and software licenses.

Winner: LastPass. It allows you to store secure notes, a wide range of data types, and files.

8. Security Audit

From time to time, a web service that you use will be hacked, and your password compromised. That’s a great time to change your password! But how do you know when that happens? It’s hard to keep track of so many logins, but many password managers will let you know, and LastPass’ Security Challenge feature is a good example.

It will go through all of your passwords looking for security concerns including:

compromised passwords,

weak passwords,

reused passwords, and

old passwords.

LastPass will even offer to automatically change the passwords of some sites for you, which is incredibly handy, and even available to those using the free plan.

KeePass doesn’t have anything comparable. The best I could find is a Password Quality Estimation plugin that adds a column to rank your password strength, helping you identify weak passwords.

Winner: LastPass. It warns you of password-related security concerns, including when a site you use has been breached, and also offers to change passwords automatically, though not all sites are supported.

9. Pricing & Value

Most password managers have subscriptions that cost $35-40/month. These two apps go against the grain by allowing you to manage your passwords for free.

KeePass is completely free, with no strings attached. LastPass offers a very usable free plan—one that allows you to sync an unlimited number of passwords to an unlimited number of devices, as well as most of the features you’ll need. It also offers additional plans that require you to pay a subscription:

Premium: $36/year,

Families (6 family members included): $48/year,

Team: $48/user/year,

Business: up to $96/user/year.

Winner: Tie. KeePass is completely free, and LastPass offers an excellent free plan.

Final Verdict

Unless you’re a geek, I strongly recommend you choose LastPass over KeePass. I’m familiar with open source software—I used Linux as my only operating system for almost a decade (and loved it)—so I understand that there’s a certain satisfaction that comes from solving technical puzzles to get an app to behave the way you want. But most people don’t feel that way.

LastPass is much more usable and much more capable. It will make your passwords available on all of your devices without needing to resort to a third-party solution. It will also let you share your passwords with others, manage sensitive documents and information, offers full-featured password auditing, and offers to change your passwords automatically.

KeePass has a place for technical users who are willing to put in the effort to get it working the way they want. Some users will appreciate that your data is stored securely on your own computer rather than the cloud, others will love how customizable and extensible it is, and many will appreciate that it’s open source.

LastPass or KeePass, which one is right for you? I think that for most of you the decision is pretty cut and dry. But if you’re having trouble deciding, I recommend you carefully evaluate each app to see for yourself which best meets your needs.

Update the detailed information about Google Pixel 5A Vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Which One Should You Buy? on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!