You are reading the article Lg G2 Vs Galaxy S 4 Vs Moto X: Hero Phone War updated in December 2023 on the website Minhminhbmm.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Lg G2 Vs Galaxy S 4 Vs Moto X: Hero Phone War
LG G2 vs Galaxy S 4 vs Moto X: hero phone war
Now that LG has released its 2013 hero smartphone in the LG G2, it’s time to hit the specifications battleground. What we’re doing here on SlashGear first is taking on not just the Samsung Galaxy S 4, but the Motorola Moto X as well, aiming to give you an idea of the range of devices that are now sitting up on top of the game from several of the smartphone universe’s top brands. We’ll be saving the HTC One for a separate, individual battle – coming up not long after this one.
At once the differences between the Moto X, Galaxy S 4, and LG G2 are apparent in the size of their displays. The LG G2 comes in above the rest with a 5.2-inch panel while the Galaxy S 4 works with a 5-inch screen and the Moto X sits in as smallest with 4.7-inches if display. Meanwhile they’re each working with a different combination of display technology and pixel resolution as well as body size.
LG G2 5.2-inch IPS LCD at 1920 x 1080 pixels: 424 PPI
GS 4 5-inch Pentile AMOLED a 1920 x 1080 pixels: 441 PPI
Moto X 4.7-inch AMOLED at 1280 x 720 pixels: 313 PPI
LG G2 5.5 x 2.8 x 0.35
GS 4 5.4 x 2.8 x 0.31
Moto X 5 x 2.6 x 0.41 Inches
The Samsung Galaxy S 4 works with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 quad-core processor while the LG G2 works with the next step up in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 quad-core processor. Moto X works with an amalgamation called the Motorola X8 computing system in an iteration that utilizes more Qualcomm architecture.
ABOVE: Samsung Galaxy S 4 vs LG G2 side-by-side.Before you go any further, we’d like to encourage you to view the hands-on and/or review of each of these devices to get a better idea of what they’re all about, top to bottom:
• Moto X Review
• Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review
• LG G2 hands-on (stay tuned for SlashGear’s full review)
The LG G2 works with a 13-megapixel camera at its back and a 2.1-megapixel camera up front. This camera also works with 9 multi-point auto-focus and LG’s intelligent auto scene detection – and no less than a bit of the ol’ Sapphire Glass to cover its lens, with anti-fingerprint protection, too. See our LG G2 camera article from earlier today to get the full briefing.
Each of these devices work with the following, as well:
• 2GB RAM
• Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean
• 16 or 32GB internal storage *GS4 also has a 64GB option and a 64GB microSD slot
• Carried by top four carriers in the USA
• 4G LTE
Both the Samsung and LG devices work with embedded IR-blasters for controlling your TV set and other infrared devices while the Moto X does not. The Samsung Galaxy S 4 has a removable battery while the battery on the Moto X and in the LG G2 is embedded. While pricing remains unknown on the LG G2, the Moto X and Samsung Galaxy S 4 can cost as little as $199.99 connected to a 2-year contract.
Does any one of the three devices above stand out to you as the clear winner? How about if the HTC One is kicked into the mix? Let us know what you’re aiming for and why – and what else you’d like to know about these three (and the HTC One) between here and our final review of the LG G2!
You're reading Lg G2 Vs Galaxy S 4 Vs Moto X: Hero Phone War
We loved – strike that – still love the LG G2, so we’re pleased to find the LG G3 is a solid upgrade to the G2. It has a faster processor, an improved camera and the ability to expand the phone’s internal storage with a microSDXC card, plus it beats all its rivals with a quad-HD screen and good value for money.
When the LG G2 was released we judged it to be the best smartphone money can buy, and to this day it sits atop our best smartphone 2014 chart. It has set a huge example for the LG G3 to live up to. Here we compare the specs of the LG G2 and LG G3. Also see our LG G3 hands-on review .LG G2 vs LG G3: Pricing
Part of the reason we were so impressed with the LG G2 was that it came on to the market some £150- to £200 cheaper than other flagship smartphones at £399, and yet the specs were just as good as those of its rivals.
Best SIM-only deals.
LG hasn’t confirmed UK pricing for its G3, but Clove is listing it at £499. This means it undercuts both the HTC One M8 and Sony Xperia Z2, and is only a few pounds more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S5.LG G2 vs LG G3: Design and build
Despite now featuring a larger 5.5in screen, the 146.3×74.6mm LG G3 is only slightly taller and wider than the 138.5×70.9mm G2, and is actually thinner at 8.9mm versus 9.1mm. It’s a little heavier, at 149g versus 143g, but not so much that the difference will be particularly noticable.
Now available in white, gold and silver, the LG G3 is otherwise very similar in design and build to the LG G2, solid and well made. Previously with a plastic rear it now has a lightweight metal housing.
As with its predecessor, the LG G3 features a Rear Key (power and volume buttons found on the handset’s back rather than its side), but now also includes a dual-LED flash and 13Mp camera that can record 4K (3840×2160) video here.LG G2 vs LG G3: Processor and performance, RAM and storage
The LG G2 pairs a quad-core 2.26GHz Snapdragon 800 processor with 2GB of RAM and Adreno 330 graphics. This configuration allowed it to score 848 points in the single-core component of the Geekbench 3 test, and 2,271 points in the multi-core section; in Geekbench 2 we measured 4,085 points. In SunSpider the LG G2 put in a great performance at 901ms, and in GFXBench 3.0 it thrashed most of the competition with 51fps in the Egypt test and 23fps in T-Rex.
The new LG G3 features a 2.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor with Adreno 330 graphics and either 2- or 3GB of RAM depending on whether you buy the 16- or 32GB version. That’s the same hardware combination as the Samsung Galaxy S5, Sony Xperia Z2 and HTC One M8, the latter of which aced our benchmarks with 962 points in Geekbench 3.0 single-core and 2,761 multi-core, 583ms in SunSpider and 30fps in GFXBench T-Rex.
You can compare the performance of all the smartphones we’ve recently tested in our article: What’s the fastest smartphone 2014: processor, graphics and web performance comparison.
Benchmarks don’t always tell the whole story, especially when benchmark-boosting software is implemented by smartphone manufacturers, but with these hardware specifications you can be sure the LG G3 is one of the fastest smartphones you can buy, and a clear improvement on the LG G2 in this regard.
As before, the LG G3 is available with 16- or 32GB of internal storage. LG has also fixed our only real complaint with the G2 by adding a microSDXC slot that lets you add a further 128GB.LG G2 vs LG G3: Display
The LG G2 squeezes into a chassis much smaller than you might expect a 5.2in (1080×1920, 423ppi) IPS touchscreen, with a super-slim bezel that gives it a great edge-to-edge look. To turn on the screen you simply give it a double-tap, and to turn it off you double-tap an empty section of the home screen or the notification bar.
The screen is one of the key differences with the LG G3, both larger and significantly higher in resolution. LG has specified a 5.5in Quad-HD (1440×2560) IPS panel with a staggeringly high pixel density of 534ppi. The G3 therefore places itself as the ultimate smartphone on which to watch video, view photos and play games.LG G2 vs LG G3: Camera
The LG G3, like the G2, features 13Mp rear- and 2.1Mp front cameras. The G2 has a 1/3.06in sensor, 29mm focal length and f/2.4 aperture, while the G3 boasts of optical image stabilisation and a laser autofocus, allowing it to focus faster than the blink of an eye. The front-facing camera is ideal for selfies: an auto timer can be triggered with a hand movement, while the screen acts as a makeshift flash.
We’ve displayed a picture shot with the LG G2’s rear camera below.
The LG G3 will also reportedly film 4K-resolution (3840×2160) video (the G2 tops out at 1920×1080 @ 60fps) and features a dual- rather than single-LED flash.LG G2 vs LG G3: Connectivity
Just like its predecessor the LG G3 supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and 4G, plus it has an IR transmitter. With the LG G3 Wi-Fi support is now extended to dual-band 802.11ac, and you get LTE-Advanced connectivity.LG G2 vs LG G3: Software
While the LG G2 is supplied with Android Jelly Bean, like its newer sibling it can be upgraded to run the latest version of Android, 4.4 KitKat.
LG’s Practical UX interface looks similar to Samsung’s TouchWiz, with popping colours and cluttered areas – it’s crammed just about everything imaginable into its notification bar.
KnockOn lets you turn on and off the phone with a double-tap, which makes moving the power button to the rear less of an issue. Some other tricks we’ve previously found useful include Guest Mode, QSlide (which lets you place several apps in a small window that can be moved around the screen), Slide Aside (which lets you slide offscreen up to three apps and then recall them with a reverse gesture or via the notification bar), plus the ability to reply to text messages without opening them and wirelessly access the phone’s storage from a PC or laptop.
You’ll find more avanced personalisation features in the LG G3, which can learn your usage patterns to offer you more personalised information. The interface has also been slightly reworked, with flatter-looking icons.LG G2 vs LG G3: Battery
In common with the LG G2 the LG G3 features a 3,000mAh removable lithium-polymer battery, with support for wireless charging. Our G2 can last a good couple of days, perhaps even three with light usage. With a larger, higher-resolution screen and a faster processor inside you might think battery life would suffer, although LG claims to tackle this with adaptive framerates, adaptive clocking and adaptive timing control. We’ll be able to investigate this when we get the LG G3 into our lab for thorough testing.
Don’t like the LG G3? Check out the competition in our article: 27 best smartphones of 2014.
Follow Marie Brewis on Twitter.Specs LG G2: Specs
Android 4.2.2 Jelly Bean OS
5.2in IPS display (1080×1920), 424 ppi
2.26GHz Quad-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 CPU
Adreno 330 GPU
16/32GB internal storage
13Mp rear camera AF with LED Flash
2Mp front camera
Video recording at up to 1080p @60fps
Bluetooth 4.0 LE
HSDPA, 42 Mbps
HSUPA, 21 Mbps
4G LTE (Cat 4)
11.1Wh (3000mAh) battery
The Moto G punches so far above its price tag that the large difference in price between it and the Moto X and the small difference in hardware and software mean the Moto X isn’t worth the extra money.
The Moto X is coming to the UK and the Moto G is already available so you might be trying to decide which to buy. Well that’s where we come in because we’ve compared the two Android smartphones in various categories to highlight how they differ.
See also: Nexus 5 vs Moto X comparison review: Which Google Android smartphone should you buy?Moto G vs Moto X: Price
Motorola smashed it in terms of value for money with the Moto G, offering users a mid-range smartphone for a budget price. There’s little to argue about with a price of just £130 to buy it outright.
Things are a little different when it comes to the Moto X. It’s Motorola’s current flagship smartphone so it’s bound to cost more than the Moto G and as such has a £350 price tag.
This means you can buy nearly three Moto Gs for the price of one Moto X. So it is worth the extra money? Read on to find out. See also: Best smartphones.Moto G vs Moto X: Design
Both of Motorola’s phones look very similar. Even though the screen sizes are a little different, the devices themselves are about the same size. In fact, the Moto G with is smaller screen is a little bigger than the Moto X. It’s also understandably thicker and heavier than its more expensive brother.Moto G vs Moto X: Screen
Screen size is a great way to choose between two smartphones – you’ll want to pick a size that’s comfortable for you personally. There’s only a small difference between the Moto G and Moto X here. The former is rocking a 4.5in display while the latter give you a little extra at 4.7in.
They both use a 720p resolution so it’s in fact the Moto G which has a better pixel density but there’s not much in it so it’s better to go on the size.
As our readers have pointed out, the Moto X uses AMOLED technology. Colours are more vibrant and punchy but some users may prefer the more natural look of the Moto G’s display – I certainly do.Moto G vs Moto X: Processor
Despite its bargain basement price, the Moto G has a 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 quad-core processor with 1GB of RAM. Meanwhile, the Moto X has a dual-core Snapdragon Pro chip clocked a bit higher at 1.7GHz. It’s got 2GB of RAM.
This might seem a little confusing but the bottom line is that both offer decent performance so you needn’t worry. The Moto X has a software optimised chip with a natural language processor and a contextual computing processor. Just bear in mind that the Moto G is punching way above its weight here.Moto G vs Moto X: Storage
With no expandable storage available on the Moto G or Moto X, storage is another area to consider closely. The Moto G is available in 8- or 16GB models while the Moto X has double these capacities. However, it appears that the 32GB Moto X missed its flight to the UK.Moto G vs Moto X: Cameras
The Moto G has a mid-range 5Mp main camera which takes surprisingly good photos. It’s even got an HDR shooting mode. Although the 10Mp camera on the Moto X isn’t quite as good as we’d hoped, it still offers more details and video in 1080p compare to 720p. It’s front camera is also better at 2Mp against 1.3Mp.Moto G vs Moto X: Software
Although both phones run pretty vanilla versions of Android, there are differences which you should be aware of. On top of things like Moto Assist, the Moto X has unique features like Active display and Quick capture. It’s also got voice recognition which can learn your voice so there are a few reasons to opt for the Moto X over the Moto G here.Moto G vs Moto X: Battery life
It’s worth noting that neither the Moto X nor Moto G has a removable battery. Each phone offers typical smartphone battery performance of one day with an average usage. Only light users will get more than a day.Specs Motorola Moto X: Specs
OS: Android 4.4 KitKat
CPU: 1.7 GHz dual-core Krait Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon Pro
GPU: Adreno 320
Display: 4.7in AMOLED 720×1280, 312 ppi
Internal storage: 16/32GB, 2 years 50GB of Google Drive free
Memory: 2GB RAM
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 4.0 LE
Main Camera: 10Mp, autofocus, LED flash
Camera Features 1.4µm pixel size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR
Front Camera: 2Mp
Microsoft on Monday introduced a portfolio of smartphones based on the new Windows Phone 7 operating system to take on the iPhone 4 and the Android army. Of the ten new Windows Phone 7 devices, six will be headed to the U.S. market: AT&T will have the HTC 7 Surround, the LG Quantum, and the Samsung Focus; Sprint will have the HTC 7 Pro; and T-Mobile will get the HTC HD7 and the Dell Venue Pro (aka Lightning).
The six new Windows Phone 7 devices due out next month all run on a 1GHz processor, as do most smartphones on the market today. The LG Quantum and the Samsung Focus have 256MB of RAM, the Dell Venue Pro has 512MB, and each of the three HTC devices offers 576MB.
The HTC 7 Pro, the HTC HD7, and the LG Quantum carry 16GB of on-board storage for your music and videos. The HTC 7 Surround, the Samsung Focus, and the lower-end version of the HTC HD7 come with 8GB of storage.
If you’re looking for a large-screen Windows Phone 7 device, you have a wide range of choices. Screen sizes start at the 3.5 inches diagonally (the same size as the iPhone) for the LG Quantum, and move up to a whopping 4.3 inches diagonally (the same size as the Droid X) for the HTC HD7. Display resolution is 480 by 800 pixels on all of the Windows Phone 7 devices, putting them on a par with the Droid X and the T-Mobile G2. The iPhone 4, with its 3.5-inch display still boasts the highest pixel density and the largest resolution in this comparison.
If you want a hardware keyboard, you have three choices: the Samsung Focus and the HTC 7 Pro have lateral slide-out keyboards, while the Dell Venue Pro has a vertical QWERTY slide-out keyboard. If you don’t need a keyboard, you can always go for the HTC 7 Surround, the Samsung Focus, or the HTC HD7.
All six Windows Phone 7 devices come with a 5-megapixel camera, with a flash. All of the cameras can record video, too, and on the HTC devices you get HD (720p) video capture, as on the iPhone and Android phones. The only U.S.-bound Windows Phone 7 device with a front-facing camera for handling video calls is the Samsung Focus.
Other features shared by all six Windows Phone 7 smartphones are Wi-Fi, GPS, and Bluetooth; none of them has an HDMI slot, however, as the Droid X does. On the other hand, perks such as a slide-out surround-sound speaker on the HTC 7 Surround, and Dolby Digital sound on all three HTC phones, should compensate for this omission.
Microsoft’s new Windows Phone 7 OS has some difficulties to overcome. The OS lacks such functionality as copy/paste and multitasking–features that rivals like Apple took their time to implement but now do have on the market. Like iOS, the Windows Phone 7 devices lack Adobe Flash support; and in contrast to most Android smartphones on Verizon, they can’t act as a Wi-Fi hotspot.
Applications will be another challenge for Microsoft, as developers have yet to rush to create apps for the platform (despite cash incentives). In comparison, Apple has over 270,000 apps, and Android over 100,000, so Microsoft has some catching up to do in this department.
The as-yet untested Windows Phone 7 devices could have a bright future. My colleague Ginny Mies spent some hands-on time with the new OS, and despite her doubts, she was impressed with it. The OS on an HTC HD7 was fast, Mies reported, and she liked what she saw in the first encounter.
Follow Daniel Ionescu and Today @ PCWorld on Twitter.
Google Nexus 9 review
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4
Google’s Nexus 9 features an 8.9-inch LCD display with 2048 x 1536 resolution and a pixel density of 281 ppi. The Tab S features an 8.4-inch Super AMOLED display with 2560 x 1600 resolution and a pixel density of 359 ppi.
Both tablets offer great viewing angles and are extremely sharp. However, the biggest difference between these two tablets is the aspect ratio. The Nexus 9 has a 4:3 aspect ratio, which isn’t too common on tablets for a reason. Letter boxing occurs more than we’d like it to when watching videos or movies, but that’s the sacrifice you’ll need to make when choosing a squarer display. We understand that no aspect ratio is perfect for everyone, as Samsung’s 16:9 ratio has its flaws as well. Holding the tablet in portrait mode is okay, but Internet browsing in landscape on the Tab S isn’t ideal, as not much information can fit on the screen, especially because web pages aren’t usually laid out side-to-side. Additionally, thanks to the Nexus 9’s LCD panel, we’ve experienced a bit of light bleed on the top and bottom of the display. However, that’s nothing you would particularly notice in everyday use.
When it comes to displays, if you want a more natural color display palette, you might want to consider the Nexus 9. But if you’re partial to punchier colors and deeper blacks, the Tab S is for you. What’s more, the Tab S offers a significantly higher pixel density, resulting in an overall clearer display.
The Nexus 9 offers the powerful NVIDIA Tegra K1 processor backed by 2GB of RAM. The Tab S features Samsung’s own Exynos 5 Octacore chipset backed by 3GB of RAM.
Thanks to the Tegra K1, gaming on the Nexus 9 is runs particularly well. We haven’t seen many dropped framerates or stutters in games, so if you’d like a tablet specifically for gaming, the Nexus 9 might be your best bet. Gaming on the Tab S isn’t laggy either, though we can’t help but notice it feels just half of a step slower than the Nexus 9. If you buy one tablet or the other for gaming, you won’t be disappointed with either.
When it comes to performance in software, the two don’t really differ. Thanks to the stock Google experience on Android 5.0 Lollipop, the Nexus 9 flies through the software with ease. We didn’t notice many hiccups while scrolling through recent apps, web pages, or really any other aspects of the software. Though the Tab S has many more software features to push around in Samsung’s TouchWiz, it performs surprisingly well.
In case you’re new to the tablet world, software is where these tablets differ more than anything. Google’s Nexus line has always come with a “no-frills” software experience. Nexus devices always run stock Android software, and that can be both a positive and a negative. Without a ton of extra features crammed into the device, the software runs very smoothly. Whether you’re a fan of Android 5.0 Lollipop or not, there’s no arguing that the software experience is one of the most simple and elegant experiences out there. On top of that, this device was made by Google, so it will be one of the first devices to receive any updates that are pushed out to Android.
Samsung takes a vastly different route when it comes to software. We’ve all said it before, and we’ll say it again: TouchWiz is bright, big, colorful, and very busy. From the cluttered Settings panel to the busy notification drop down menu, it’s clear that simplicity isn’t Samsung’s strongest asset. However, it’s cluttered for a reason. With so many extra features crammed into the software, you’ll find some to be extremely useful and others to just take up space. Unfortunately, software updates are pretty scarce with Samsung devices. The Tab S is still running Android 4.4 KitKat. While not too many other manufacturers have pushed out Lollipop updates so far, Samsung is usually last to update their devices. Though it’s a relatively new tablet, the Tab S may not see its Lollipop update for quite some time.
When comparing the two, it should be noted that Samsung is one of the only device manufacturers to actually use a big screen the correct way. Features like Multi-Window that allows for running multiple apps at once, Smart Stay that keeps the screen on when you’re looking at it, and Smart Pause that pauses a video when you look away, really help make for a better media-consuming experience.
Where the Nexus 9 comes up short in the number of features, it makes up for it in design. Android 5.0 Lollipop brings more UI enhancements to Android using Google’s new Material Design language. In Lollipop, everything warrants a movement, whether that be the information on the notification shade moving when you pull it down, or any number of new layers Google has added in to show more depth in the software, it’s all just really good looking. We aren’t sure what Lollipop will bring to Samsung’s TouchWiz, but we do know that it may not get there for quite some time.
All in all, if you’re looking for a tablet that has more features than you can count and incredible multitasking software, the clear choice is the Tab S. But if you’re more partial to the simplistic, elegant and quickly-updated software experience, we’d suggest you go with the Nexus 9. Keep in mind that neither devices’ software experience is perfect, and sacrifices will need to be made with both.
The Nexus 9’s starting price is $399 for the 16GB Wifi-only model. Higher storage options and LTE-connected variants are also available, so be prepared to pay more depending on which option you choose. It’s also available in Black, White, and Sand colors, and can be purchased directly through Google Play, HTCor Amazon.
The Galaxy Tab S 8.4 also begins at $400, and can be bought directly through Samsung, or basically any other electronics retailer out there. It’s available in Dazzling White or Titanium Bronze, and also comes in higher-storage variants. Though the Tab S is priced at $400, at the time of writing this, we found a few on Amazon being sold for under $350.
So, there you have it — our comparison of the Google Nexus 9 vs. the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4. Again, your decision on whether to buy one tablet over the other completely lies in your needs. The Tab S offers great multitasking software, a solid build quality, and is slightly more portable. However, be willing to put up with cluttered software and a slightly lower battery capacity. The Nexus 9 offers a beautiful, simple software experience with a large battery and loud front-firing speakers. Nonetheless, choosing the Nexus 9 means you’ll need to deal with slightly less-quality hardware and not many extra tablet-friendly software features.
When comparing these two, it’s very apparent that neither one is close to perfect, but if you’re looking for a tablet that has an 8 or 9-inch display, you can’t go wrong with either one. Let us know your thoughts on these two tablets!
In past few years, both these companies have adopted different approaches to market and offer their products. But, in order to offer bigger and better display packed in sleek body with improved camera capabilities, both the phones hold quite a similar design and specifications. So, let’s see which smartphone overshadow the other when we put these two against each other.Samsung Galaxy S8 VS LG G6 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy S8 features a 5.8-inch Quad HD+ Infinity Super AMOLED display with a new pressure sensitivity features. The screen resolution is 2960 X 1440 pixel and gives a pixel density of ~568 ppi. The screen is further backed with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
In order to make the display bezel free, both the companies have opted a taller aspect ratio than traditional 16:9 which changes the user experience to a great extent. LG has opted Univisium standard of 18:9 while Samsung is using 18:5:9 aspect chúng tôi LG, this is the best display that the company has ever produced while Samsung has upgraded its standards to the next level.Hardware And Storage
As both the phones are flagship models of their respective companies, both the smartphones are packed with strong specifications. Samsung Galaxy S8 features Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset for the US market with an octa-core processor and Adreno 540 GPU while the international variant will feature Samsung Exynos 8895 chipset with Mali-G71 MP20 GPU. The processor is further coupled to 4GB RAM and 64GB internal storage. The storage can be further expanded via microSD up to 256GB.
Whereas, the LG G6 comes with a quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 processor with Adreno 530 GPU. The processor is further coupled to 4GB RAM and 32/64GB UFS 2.0 internal storage. Just like Galaxy S8, the storage can be expanded via microSD but, up to 2TB.Camera
This is the area, where both the manufacturers have put their best efforts to come up with exceptional photography experience. Though dual camera setup is now the new trend in the flagships, Samsung has not adopted this and packed the S8 with 12 MP dual pixel sensor at f/1.7 aperture with Optical Image Stabilisation. The video recording can be done up to 4K resolution. At the front, it packs an 8MP selfie-shooter.
Whereas, LG G6 is packed with two 13-megapixel sensors which consists one wide angle lens with f/2.4 aperture and 125° field of view and another “regular” lens with f/1.8 aperture and 71° field of view. OIS and PDAF is standard on the primary camera but, with wide angle lens the image stabilization and autofocus is lacking.Connectivity
Whereas, the LG G6 offers Wi-Fi 802.11, Bluetooth v4.2, NFC, GPS and USB Type C 1.0.Battery
Samsung Galaxy S8 is packed with 3000mAh battery while the LG G6 houses 3300mAh pack, which is slightly bigger than the S8 and better for the big screen and always on display.Pricing & Availability
LG G6 has not confirmed the pricing of G6 yet and will be revealing the pricing details soon. But, Samsung Galaxy S8 is priced at $750 (Rs 48,615 approximately) and will be available for sale from April 21 in the US market.Conclusion
Update the detailed information about Lg G2 Vs Galaxy S 4 Vs Moto X: Hero Phone War on the Minhminhbmm.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!