Trending December 2023 # Solana Vcs Hold More Than 30% Supply, Is There Something Needs To Be Worried # Suggested January 2024 # Top 18 Popular

You are reading the article Solana Vcs Hold More Than 30% Supply, Is There Something Needs To Be Worried updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 Solana Vcs Hold More Than 30% Supply, Is There Something Needs To Be Worried

The Solana project can topple if the VCs decide to withdraw their investment. Key Points:

Solana has tanked during the current bear market

VCs withdrawals could collapse the coin

Non-VCs backed projects like Bitgert are more resilient

The current crashing of Terra LUNA has attracted a lot of attention in the market, as the experts try to analyze what could have caused the problem. However, the issue of VCs-funded projects has been coming up. VCs withdrawing funds is the potential to crash a project. There are many crypto projects that are VCs backed, and one of them is Solana. In fact, Solana has more than 30% of its supply backed by VCs. What does this mean for the Solana project? Is there something that Solana investors should be worried about? Well, probably not because Solana is a solid project with real use cases. But the fact that +30% supply is under VCs still puts Solana in the category of the crypto projects that can be destabilized easily. The Solana project can topple if the VCs decide to withdraw their investment. This could explain why Solana has been one of the most affected coins by the current bear market.

The current crashing of Terra LUNA has attracted a lot of attention in the market, as the experts try to analyze what could have caused the problem. However, the issue of VCs-funded projects has been coming up. VCs withdrawing funds is the potential to crash a project. There are many crypto projects that are VCs backed, and one of them is Solana. In fact, Solana has more than 30% of its supply backed by VCs. What does this mean for the Solana project? Is there something that Solana investors should be worried about? Well, probably not because Solana is a solid project with real use cases. But the fact that +30% supply is under VCs still puts Solana in the category of the crypto projects that can be destabilized easily. The Solana project can topple if the VCs decide to withdraw their investment. This could explain why Solana has been one of the most affected coins by the current bear market. The huge withdrawals, probably by some of the VCs have been causing the Solana price plunges. However, there are coins that have proven super resilient during the bearish market. Among the projects that have grown without VCs is Bitgert (BRISE) Bitgert managed to reach a $700M marketcap without VCs. Unlike Solana, the Bitgert team has built the project from scratch with VCs. That’s why Bitgert maintained a stable price during the bearish market. Bitgert has attracted thousands of investors with the revolutionary blockchain project it is building. Looking at the Bitgert ecosystem shows a crypto project that is becoming the next big thing in the industry. The Bitgert team has already launched the Bitgert BRC20 blockchain , which is the chain that all its products and projects are running. Note that the Bitgert blockchain is the first chain to overtake Solana blockchain speed. But the most anticipated is the Bitgert roadmap V2 , which the Bitgert team has just launched. Even without VCs, Bitgert has already delivered the roadmap V1. Bitgert is now taking the ecosystem growth further with the roadmap V2, which will make the Bitgert ecosystem even larger than the Solana ecosystem. In conclusion, most VCs backed projects have wobbled during the bear market, with Solana being an example. But projects like Bitgert , which do not have VCs, have resilient to crashing markets. Solana investors may have nothing to worry about, but Solana will never be as stable as Bitgert , with VCs holding 30% supply.

You're reading Solana Vcs Hold More Than 30% Supply, Is There Something Needs To Be Worried

Will Bitcoin Traders Be More Assured Or More Worried In 2023?

The past year was punctuated by a series of extreme peaks and troughs. In spite of that, however, there is an assured collective acceptance of Bitcoin, one that is palpable. 2023 particularly was dominated by numbers and growth. Here are a few highlights,

Crypto’s collective market cap increased by 284%

Bitcoin Year to Date spike was as high as 272%

Crypto-Derivatives Trading Volume Average in 2023 was 62.4 billion; Q1 2023 crossed $2 trillion, smashing the 2023 average by 314%

Bitcoin Active Addresses % change – 125%

The list goes on and on, but we are not here for the accolades. When speaking about a transitional change (a coming-of-age from 2023), the perspective of crypto-traders or Bitcoin investors has evolved drastically over the past three years. From a point of high risk and high volatility in 2023, how will crypto-traders look at the market in 2023?

Speaking of Volatility and Bitcoin Velocity

Back in 2023, before and after the bull run, volatility was a major concern for traders. It was always an ‘expect the unexpected situation’ with Bitcoin and the rest. The Volatility Index indicated the same, but the end of 2023 has been different.

Another important metric that defines the evolution of Crypto-traders is Bitcoin’s 1-year Active Supply Velocity chart. Velocity measures the number of times an average unit of supply has been transferred. The attached cycle highlights the uncertainty early adopters and traders faced, in comparison to the newer ones.

Since 2023, a successful precedent and better understanding of the digital asset industry has led to controlled FUD, as a result of which, traders are currently better equipped with the knowledge to navigate through the market.

Open the Institutional Floodgates

Traders from 2023 are fortunate to witness the injection of institutional capital. Before the 2023 bull run, CBOE and CME BTC Futures were just beginning to hit the markets. There was no relevant liquidity, let alone optimism, for a successful market ahead.

It was all in an experimental phase, one where traders would literally need to go in with the expectation of losing most of their capital.

Not anymore. CME, one of the largest derivatives exchanges in the world, recorded a new all-time high in Open Interest. OI represents the total value of the outstanding contracts that haven’t been settled. CME’s Bitcoin product is significant because it is accessible to multitudes of retail and institutional traders across the world at the moment.

The improving derivatives instruments have given Bitcoin and other assets exposure, something that was unheard of in 2023. For a trader entering the market in 2023, identifying value in crypto-assets will be much easier, unlike 3 years ago.

Against the Odds, Bitcoin displayed its mettle

With the previous factors, there was a layer of commonality. Each condition evolved and become positive for Bitcoin over time, and all of it mostly relied on market maturity and eventual growth in interest.

However, 2023 threw a curveball at Bitcoin in the form of a pandemic which might have been its strongest test yet. Since 2009, the larger economic landscape had avoided any underlying concerns of inflation. The narrative was flipped when the COVID-19 pandemic crippled the economy during a world-wide lockdown. The traditional market faced its largest depreciation since the 1980s and Bitcoin’s valuation crumbled amidst financial uncertainty.

Dropping under $4000, skeptics were quick to write off Bitcoin’s capability to recover in an inflation-heavy environment. No points for guessing what happened next. 

Not only was Bitcoin the first major asset to bounce back, but it also continued to hold a higher position after every bullish rally. Crypto-traders, new and old, paid attention to Bitcoin’s resilience. With a valuation of nearly $29k at press time (New ATH, that’s right!), it is safe to assume Bitcoin passed with flying colors.

Traders thinking ahead in 2023

So, putting things in context, a lot has changed between 2023 and 2023 for crypto-traders. Unlike the previous allure of ‘get rich quick’ sentiment with cryptos, the digital asset class has evolved into a more definite and trustable unit in the trading industry.

In 2023, it is not a gamble to invest in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as was the case in post-December 2023. Traders are currently identifying injection of smart money, and an organic institutional presence in the digital asset market. While the asset class remains volatile as ever, it is important to note that other assets such as the S&P 500 and Dow Jones have been more volatile than BTC in 2023.

This Is Why Your Martech Stack Needs To Be Smarter

There is a big opportunity to gather valuable data, but having data sitting in a database isn’t enough.

The future of customer marketing is data. Brands say they want to “be more data-driven” and level up their marketing. There is a big opportunity to gather valuable data, but having data sitting in a database isn’t enough. Only by refining the process of data activation can brands improve conversions, promote loyalty and increase repeat purchases.

This means that your Martech stack can push you forward or hold you back.

Download our Business Resource – Marketing technology selection guide


Access the Marketing technology selection guide

In a world where your marketing results are directly influenced by the marketing technology you use, you need to choose smart tools. Let’s see how the use of smarter MarTech makes it easier to live up to today’s customer expectations.

Think about it.

Can you easily add product recommendations to your site or email campaigns?

Can you easily and quickly optimize and A/B test campaigns?

How about using segmentation or behavioural-based automation?

In my experience with companies, the easier and faster it is to bring data-driven intelligence to the table, the higher the adoption will be in all phases. How you create a marketing campaign is dictated by the possibilities your technology gives.

Take for instance email segmentation. The number of segments a marketer can deploy campaigns to is limited by the tools they use. Each manual step in the process to generate creative for each segment and do A/B multivariate testing limits the number of segments you can manage.

Now if you’d use marketing tools to do tasks for you automatically, it removes those limitations and allows for smaller segments or even “segment of one” marketing.

An example of AI for micro-segmentation

A case study on how AI for micro-segmentation works to drive your goals comes from Amplero and BECU. They desired to improve email responses and drive additional mortgage, credit card and auto loan applications.

With the use of Machine Learning from the tool, micro-segments are automatically generated. Smaller groups of contacts that have similar characteristics. The software then automatically tests different combinations of email subject lines, images, content and offers to determine the best variants (per segment) in order to drive increased applications – the goal of the campaigns.

An optimization overview like this is akin to a decision tree , only showing different segments and smaller segments based on their variables. This campaign showed a 10% lift for credit card, auto loan, and mortgage applications over “business as usual” campaigns. This form of marketing automation shows the capability of automated grouping, matching, recommendations, and testing.

Financial services and banks work in a highly competitive space and have a limited amount of net new prospects. Once you have initial contact, it is definitely worth optimizing financial services email marketing. The very high value per customer and limited variable costs make it especially attractive to put data to work. At the same time, once preferences are recognized – the roll-out is fit for every direct marketing channel.

From signal to sale: Walking down the data value chain

Thinking about data on a strategic level, it helps to visualize the flow of data and identify where the actual value is (or can be) generated. The process of creating value with the aid of data as a connected chain from start to finish. In a practical situation, you’d map each of the stages out and see where you are going to use the data and then work backward. A quick review of the major steps from signal to sale.

1. Gathering data – picking up the data signals

Traditionally the systems where the data resides (like a CRM) is called a “data source”. A ridiculous notion. Take off your IT/technology glasses for a minute – the holistic view recognizes that “where it is stored” is often not “how/where it was gathered”.

We need to recognize that the data points can be sourced from several places, multiple methods and different moments in time.

How you gather data to benefit customers is a crucial part of your business leading up to business value creation.

2. Bringing together customer data

Your first-party customer data (CRM, website, transactions, profiles) are going to be the most important data streams to feed into your marketing tool.

To bring together customer data you need requires a system that ingests and combines the data and then exposes them for use in further steps. In my opinion, it is not about bringing together as much data as possible and treating that a goal by itself, but rather bringing the data together in a mindful manner. Because in the next step, it is able to turn that ‘practical customer view’ into marketing campaigns that deliver results. Focus on the data you will be using.

It is not strange that the Customer Data Platform (CDP) as a piece of technology is getting a lot of attention. The CDP promises to provide the key to comprehensive data-driven marketing. A very attractive marketing concept where all your customer data is combined for marketing (and other) uses.

Without the data and the management of the data, the ‘marketing brain’ that allows for smarter campaigns simply can’t function and especially within near time/real time if we are acting working with – for instance – site behavior. This brings us to the next stage.

3. Insights and action

This is the inflection point. It is not enough to “have” the data, your technology should be able to give a better answer to the question what to do with the data. Think about the following themes for action.

Product and content recommendations, proposing the next best actions.

Automated testing and optimization.

Real-time alerting and notifications.

Customer Insights and analytics.

Marketing automation and automated follow up campaigns.


Lead Scoring and grading.

These are all different uses of data, that lead to a better experience along the customer journey and a more valuable road for each customer.

It works best once you know what you’d like to do. Kelly J. Waffle described a data-driven campaign for a media company that delivered a more than 35% improvement on its return from ad spend compared to historical campaigns by combining the data and improving targeting. With more than 33% of the new ad-generated subscriptions were with millennials and website visitor engagement helped drive digital subscriptions by 4X with behavioral scoring.

This stage of Data Activation is where the rubber meets the road. As I mentioned it is easiest to form a strategy based on a realistic “what we want to do” and work backward from that.

Getting into the data-driven mindset

Companies need to think differently about their data if they want to make the next step. According to the Data-Driven Marketing research by the DDMA, the number one challenge is to realize a data-driven culture, directly followed by the technology, systems, and tools.

The initial wish to “be more data-driven” is there. The access to tools and changing “the way we do things around here” to include more data-driven are two sides of the same coin. We don’t even realize how much technology is influencing the manner day-to-day campaigns are executed.

Data democratization and “Citizen” Martech

The divide between those that are doing a great job in data-driven marketing and those that aren’t might seem unbridgeable. Luckily Marketing Technology is becoming more and more “citizen”, meaning that for those marketers willing to be more data-driven – the technical limitations are fading away and a level playing field is arising. You redefine your company by the MarTech company you keep. So to fill the data-driven ambition, put an emphasis on an overall smarter MarTech stack.

Here Is Garlinghouse’s Take On Whether There Will Be An Xrp

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has castigated the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission again, with the exec now reiterating that the agency has no clear framework for the crypto-industry.

The chief executive, while speaking to Fox Business with Charles Gasparino, touched upon key aspects concerning the SEC’s motives. What’s more, he also expanded on the impact of the lawsuit against Ripple Labs, on both the firm and XRP.

‘Amazing year’ but uncertainties remain

For its part, XRP has climbed by over 172% from $0.40 to $1.10, at press time, over the course of the lawsuit. This, despite having hiked higher a few months ago. Meanwhile, the fintech firm has expanded its business across Europe and South East Asia. Its journey in the U.S, however, has been a different story.

“Since the SEC filed their lawsuit, we really haven’t been able to operate in the United States. Because of this uncertainty has existed and continues to exist. However, outside the United States, we continue to have an amazing year.”

As previously mentioned, this isn’t a point of view he’s putting forward for the first time either. In fact, he went on to say that while he expects the SEC to continue fighting the lawsuit,

“I think the whole industry benefits from that clarity and certainty about how digital assets can be regulated and that doesn’t exist in the United States and it does exist in other countries.”

In the aforementioned lawsuit, the plaintiffs had asked the court to delay a few deadlines, something the defendants found ‘severely prejudicial‘.

“We’re the ones kind of pushing because we think it’s very clear that this is not a violation of U.S securities laws. XRP is not a security, and we think ultimately that will be proven out in the court. So, we want to get to the judge as quickly as possible.”

The likelihood of settlement is…

As in the past, Ripple’s CEO was quick to reiterate,

“There is no scenario though when we are gonna settle unless there is absolute certainty about what XRP is on the go-forward basis.”

While the lawsuit is unlikely to be settled or ruled on anytime soon, the wave of optimism on the back of a Bitcoin ETF being approved has raised many pertinent questions. One of them, understandably, is this – Will the SEC approve an XRP-based ETF?

An XRP ETF in the future?

Well, instead of directly answering the question, Garlinghouse had an indirect reply.

When asked about the prospects of an XRP exchange-traded fund in the United States, he simply said,

“Why is the SEC picking winners and losers?”

The SEC has finally given the go-ahead for Bitcoin Futures ETFs in the United States. Pundits expect more such ETFs to launch in the near future.

According to Garlinghouse, since Bitcoin involves huge power usage, giving it priority does not even align with the SEC Chair’s climate agenda. The exec, who has long been a critic of Bitcoin’s energy use, believes that XRP is over 100,000 times more energy-efficient than Bitcoin.

Garlinghouse, finally, also shared his concerns about Gensler’s silence on the regulatory status of Ethereum. Especially since Ether ETFs are expected to be popular once approved too.

More Than Just Skin Deep

More Than Just Skin Deep MED center transforms skin cells into stem cells

Medical researchers Gustavo Mostoslavsky (from left), Darrell Kotton, and George Murphy are codirectors of BU’s Center for Regenerative Medicine. Last fall, the team created 100 new lung disease–specific cell lines that could lead to new treatments for diseases such as emphysema and cystic fibrosis. Photos by Vernon Doucette

Darrell Kotton, Gustavo Mostoslavsky, and George Murphy roll up their sleeves and proudly display small oval marks on their forearms. Biopsies from which the medical researchers harvested their own skin cells to create—well, actually the sky may be the limit.

“Pretty much all the biology books are wrong now,” says Murphy, a School of Medicine assistant professor of medicine, who specializes in hematology. “Because they all say that your skin cells, your skin fibroblasts are always going to be fibroblasts. Turns out now they can become cells like an embryonic stem cell, which can then differentiate into any kind of cell it wants.”

Last fall, the three CReM codirectors announced the creation of a bank of more than 100 lung disease–specific stem cell lines from patients with inherited diseases, including cystic fibrosis, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency emphysema, and sickle cell anemia. The lines mark the first time lung disease–specific iPSC have been created in a lab. The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and an ARC award from BU’s Evans Center for Interdisciplinary Research.

Led by pulmonary specialist Kotton, a MED associate professor of medicine, the team took tissue samples from patients with the diseases. Using a tool that Mostoslavsky, a MED assistant professor of medicine specializing in gastroenterology, engineered in 2008, called the stem cell cassette (STEMCCA), the team was able to reprogram adult skin cells into clinical-grade pluripotent stem cells. Mostoslavsky’s design, which BU has since patented, is now used by hundreds of labs around the world and is considered the industry standard.

“Our dream was to make a better tool, a viral vector to pop these genes into cells and do the equivalent of the University of Kyoto experiment that was better, safer, more efficient, and allowed translation to human beings in a way that was very simple and elegant,” Kotton says.

Many scientists believe that stem cells will play a crucial part in the fight against Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and a range of genetic diseases, but in the United States, because of the use of human embryos, government injunctions against their use have been issued and lifted and issued again. Even with the high-quality iPSC lines CReM has developed, embryonic stem cells are still necessary to serve as a positive control: “a roadmap for developmental biology,” as Kotton puts it.

“Using induced pluripotent stem cells removes the necessity of using a human embryo and thus avoids all of the ethical problems of egg donation, embryo creation, and embryo destruction for research purposes,” says George Annas, William Fairfield Warren Distinguished Professor and chair of the School of Public Health health law, bioethics, and human rights department. “The primary scientific research issue is determining whether or not iPSCs are as pluripotent as human embryonic stem cells, and whether they are as predictable and abnormality-free from a genetic and epigenetic standpoint.”

From lab to bedside

Murphy often uses a “flight recorder” analogy when he explains his work.

“When there’s a plane crash, investigators look for the flight recorder so they can determine each event that led up to the catastrophic event,” he says. “In much the same way, we can take skin cells from sick patients and differentiate those cells into the affected tissue type and go through all the molecular events that led up to the disease and that catastrophic event. It creates the ability to intervene early.”

Human induced pluripotent cells also allow drug developers and scientists more precision, offering a quality even embryonic cells don’t offer. The use of a person’s own skin or blood to create embryonic-like stem cells means the patient’s body won’t reject them, thereby eliminating the need for immunosuppressive drugs.

“You’re looking at cells and the disease in the context of the exact genetic background of that patient,” Murphy says. “So it becomes possible to test therapeutic drugs in the test tube before using them on patients. It’s patient-specific medicine.”

A seminal CReM project, which got under way in 2009, involves an infant in New York City with inherited long QT syndrome, which causes a serious heart arrhythmia. Kotton and his team took skin cells from the baby, as well as from the parents, and generated iPSC, which in turn were programmed to differentiate into heart muscle cells, or cardiomyocytes. CReM researchers are coordinating with laboratories in New York and Toronto to test available pharmaceuticals on those cardiomyocytes, which in essence act as the disease in miniature, to determine how best to treat the sick child.

The team has also collaborated with researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital to engineer a bioartificial rat lung that allowed a living rat to breathe for six hours. Further, they’ve developed a gene therapy that offers lifetime protection against an inherited form of emphysema in mice.

Fast friends

The three researchers have a tight bond and play well off each other. They first met as postdocs in the lab of prominent stem cell biologist Richard Mulligan at Harvard Medical School. They became fast friends and fit together like puzzle pieces.

“Darrell’s the mature statesman, Gustavo’s the passionate Argentinian, and I’m the crazy adolescent,” says the 37-year-old Murphy, who sports a ponytail and an earring in each ear.

Kotton first arrived on campus as a fellow in pulmonary and critical care medicine in 1998, and after his subsequent postdoctoral research fellowship at Harvard, he returned to MED in 2004, starting his own lab focusing on lung stem cell work. In 2008, Mostoslavsky was recruited, followed soon after by Murphy.

“Like many centers, ours is formed on scientific passion, but it’s also formed on a deep friendship that came before the center,” Kotton says. “Our main interest is love of science. We’re in love with the cells and what controls their cell fate decisions and their biology, and a wonderful side effect of all these projects is they may end up helping people, which is a great thing.”

Caleb Daniloff can be reached at [email protected].

Explore Related Topics:

Making The Grade: Is Macos Really Less Stable Than It Used To Be?

I’ve been managing macOS in an enterprise environment since 2009, so I was around during the “stable” periods of Snow Leopard, as well as what others would call unstable periods. One of the common themes I’ve heard in my technology circles over the past few years is that macOS has become less stable. I manage 100s of Mac laptops at the moment, and I would estimate I’ve been responsible for 1,000+ devices over the past ten years. So, I think I’m qualified to discuss the current state of macOS stability.

Apple has been on the yearly upgrade cycle for macOS for a few years now, so it feels like by the time we get the X.4 revision of a new version of macOS, we are getting ready to kick off a summer of running betas (for IT to prepare for compatibility) and then kick off a fall season of updates and 1.0 bugs.

What’s the current state of macOS stability?

While I don’t have data to quantify it internally, I do know that I spend a lot less time on laptop support than I used to. A lot of my time is spent managing SaaS products instead. Some of it could be that our users are savvier than they used to be, but I generally think macOS is as stable today as it was back in the Snow Leopard days. I know that is not the common perception, though. If you stop and think about how our technology world was in the “stable” days of macOS, there was no iPad, no iCloud, no iMessage, no iCloud Photos, no Apple Music, and no Apple Watch. We had an iPhone, a laptop, and we used a cable to sync them together. Our world was a lot less in flux. Now, we’ve got 4K videos we are syncing over iCloud Photos while countless GIFs transfer over iMessage. We are more complex, and that creates a lot of opportunities for things to be out of sync.

In my opinion, it’s not that the stability of macOS has changed, but rather that we expect so much more from our software than we ever have. If we went back to only features and services available in 2009, I think we’d find that all modern computing platforms are “stable” by those measurements.

Why does restarting a computer fix most things?

I had not thought about this before a recent episode of Reconcilable Differences. Merlin Mann made a great point: restarting a computer puts everything back to a known state. The problem with our current technology stack is there is no way to reboot “the cloud”. A lot of people have 4+ devices that access the same amount of data, and there are countless ways for things to not work. In fact, when I realize how many devices I have accessing my Wi-Fi and/or iCloud Data, I am surprised it even works half the time.


Stability was a key feature in iOS 12 and macOS Mojave. Both operating systems launched to much fanfare among people who were craving a year with fewer features and more bug fixes. It would be wise for Apple to repeat that process every couple of years. It would give their engineering teams time to breathe and work on long-range plans.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Update the detailed information about Solana Vcs Hold More Than 30% Supply, Is There Something Needs To Be Worried on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!