Trending February 2024 # The Clever Way Apple Lets You Record Time # Suggested March 2024 # Top 5 Popular

You are reading the article The Clever Way Apple Lets You Record Time updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 The Clever Way Apple Lets You Record Time

Apple makes it easy to record cool time-lapse video on your iPhone, but do you know how time lapses work in the Camera app? Here’s the nitty-gritty.

It’s simple to record time-lapse videos on your iPhone

Instead of adjusting a bunch of parameters, you only need to start and stop recording, and iOS will handle the rest. In Apple’s “just works” fashion, no matter how long your recording session (ten hours or ten days or ten minutes, it doesn’t matter), your time-lapse will end up being between 20 and 40 seconds long.

Visit the StudioNeat website for a graph showing how Apple’s time-lapse mode works and at which intervals the Camera app takes individual images. Generally speaking, it comes down to the following numbers.

Apple Camera app: Time-lapse frame rates

0-9 minutes: One frame every two seconds

10-19 minutes: One frame every four seconds

20-39 minutes: One frame every four seconds

40-80 minutes: One frame every four seconds

Apple’s Camera app shoots time-lapses in 1080p resolution (1920×1080) at 30 frames per second, with no HDR, regardless of your iPhone model. There’s no way to adjust the frame rate and resolution for time-lapse videos in the stock Camera app.

How time-lapse photography works

Time-lapse is a photography technique that captures individual photos or video frames at a much lower rate to create the accelerated time effect. For example, if individual photos are captured at one frame per second and then played back at 30 frames per second, time will appear to lapse 30 times faster.

Buy a tripod. Or a gimbal.

Recording time-lapse videos debuted in iOS 8, which arrived alongside iPhone 6 back in 2014. It’s been an iPhone staple since then, so it’s quite a shame that Apple hasn’t bothered to introduce any significant new time-lapse capabilities.

There isn’t a single option in Settings → Camera that would permit you to adjust how iOS captures time-lapse videos. You’ll need to download third-party apps from the App Store to shoot time-lapse footage the way you want.

The point of a time-lapse is to capture an experience over a period of time, like a setting sun or traffic flowing. Surely you don’t want to hold your iPhone steady for an extended period just to create a few seconds of a cool time-lapse.

We recommend getting a tripod or, better yet, a gimbal to stabilize your footage.

Night mode time-lapse videos on iPhone 12 and later

The iPhone 12 and newer include imaging optimizations not found on older models for shooting time-lapses using a tripod. “On iPhone 12 models and later, use a tripod to capture time-lapse videos with more detail and brightness when recording in low-light situations,” clarifies a support document on the Apple website.

Unpacking this statement, what Apple wants to say is that capturing time-lapse videos of low-light scenes with iPhone 12 or later set on a tripod will cause Apple’s night mode to kick in. Night mode uses longer shutter speeds to boost the amount of light hitting the imaging sensor, resulting in longer, better light trails.

So if you plan on creating mesmerizing time-lapse videos of cityscapes and traffic at night, or the night sky and such, be sure to use an iPhone 12 or later with a tripod.

How to use time-lapse mode in the Camera app

Before you can record a time-lapse video, please be sure to set your iPhone to Do Not Disturb mode. This will avoid vibrations if you get a phone call that could ruin your footage. To record a time-lapse video, open the Camera app and swipe right to select TIME-LAPSE at the bottom. To start recording, hit the shutter button.

Your iPhone will periodically take individual images until you tap the shutter button again. The algorithm stitches the individual photos together and saves a time-lapse video. When such footage plays back at normal speed, time appears to be moving moves much faster. You can find all your time-lapses in the Time-lapse album within the Photos app. Read: How to slow down time-lapse videos on iPhone

The iPhone 13 and newer can shoot macro time-lapse videos: Swipe to the time-lapse mode in the Camera app, then hit the .5X button at the bottom to switch to the ultra-wide lens. Next, move close to the subject (as close as 2 centimeters) and hit the shutter button to start and stop recording a macro time-lapse.

You're reading The Clever Way Apple Lets You Record Time

Is It Time To Change The Way We Talk About Human Evolution?

A fossilized skull discovered in Ethiopia in the 1970s should be considered an entirely new species of human, scientists proposed this week in an effort to shed light on the very murky question of what to call our ancient ancestors. 

In a study published on Thursday in Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, researchers compared anatomical traits in fossil hominins—the group that includes present-day humans and our extinct close relatives—from Africa, Europe, and Asia. They concluded that two currently recognized species should be retired, and that the 600,000-year-old remains from Ethiopia, along with several other specimens, should be classified as a new species they’ve dubbed Homo bodoensis.

Not everyone is convinced that a new species name is needed—after all, none of these specimens represent lineages that have never been studied before. However, the researchers argue, the changes could help researchers decipher a murky period in human evolution and move past terms with vague meanings and racist legacies. 

[Related: Your ancestors might have been Martians]

“We’re becoming increasingly aware that these groups did move and did interact, and that’s why it’s important to have a proper way of talking about them,” says Mirjana Roksandic, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Winnipeg in Manitoba and coauthor of the paper. “​​It really opens the possibility to talk about who moved when, and what happened to them when they moved, and who actually interacted with whom.”

She and her colleagues focused on hominins who lived during the Middle Pleistocene age, which spanned from 774,000 to 129,000 years ago. Although paleoanthropologists refer to these hominins as different species, they’re not using the term as most of us normally think of it. “They interacted, they interbred, and they cannot be considered as definite biological species,” Roksandic explains. Instead, the category is used to describe groups of hominins with very similar anatomical features.

These differences are more obvious in some groups of hominins than others. European Neanderthal fossils from this period differ in numerous ways from modern humans, Roksandic says. However, many other hominin fossils look very similar, making it harder to determine how they relate to each other and to Homo sapiens.

In the past, new species were often declared on the basis of a few teeth or other fragmentary evidence, says John Hawks, an anthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who was not involved in the new research. One such case was Homo heidelbergensis, which was first named after a jawbone found in a gravel pit in Germany in the early 20th century, he says. 

Then, in later decades, many fossils that didn’t seem to fit with Neanderthals, modern humans, or our ancestor Homo erectus were lumped in with Homo heidelbergensis. “The species was named after a mandible; we never knew what the head and face should look like,” says Shara Bailey, a biological anthropologist and director of the Center for the Study of Human Origins at New York University. “Basically it’s like a trash basket category.”

This helped spawn a “totally confusing” situation, Roksandic says, in which the name Homo heidelbergensis is sometimes used to refer generally to hominins from the Middle Pleistocene, and other times to refer to various specimens found in Europe. She and her colleagues argue that it’s time to abandon the name altogether, given that recent genetic evidence suggests that many fossils currently assigned to Homo heidelbergensis are actually early Neanderthals. 

Then there’s Homo rhodesiensis, which was first known from a skull uncovered by mining activity in Zambia in the 1920s. The term is sometimes used to indicate a common ancestor of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, but can also refer to all the hominin lineages represented in the Late Pleistocene. But the name is rarely used in either context, because of its association with the atrocities committed under British colonial rule in the region of Rhodesia (now Zambia and Zimbabwe). For these reasons, Roksandic’s team writes in the new study, Homo rhodesiensis has to go. 

[Related: Humans owe our evolutionary success to friendship

“Homo bodoensis would fill that void that’s left by Homo rhodesiensis,” she says. The researchers selected the enigmatic skull from Ethiopia to represent the species in their description. However, they also consider the Zambian skull and several other sets of fossils from Africa, and possibly the eastern Mediterranean, as members of Homo bodoensis. 

Like Neanderthals and some Asian hominins from the Middle Pleistocene, Homo bodoensis seems to have had an enlarged brain—a crucial development on the road to modern humans. It’s likely that Homo bodoensis was the first to split off from their shared common ancestor, with the remaining branch later splintering into Neanderthals and a group called Denisovans found in Asia, the researchers propose. 

As a next step, she and her colleagues are planning to investigate whether fossils from Europe and Asia might be members of Homo bodoensis, which could shed light on whether and when the group might have moved out of Africa.

“It’s really hard to understand what is happening in terms of human evolution in that time period unless you look at it on a very global scale,” Roksandic says. 

What’s in a name?

Hawks agrees that the two species that Roksandic and her colleagues propose jettisoning are “a problem.”

“These are confusing names, they have bad histories, and it would be way better if we had names that actually could be [scientifically] tested and that can apply in a sense that all of us are willing to use,” he says.

However, he favors a different solution. “All of these populations interbred with each other, and it seems like they’re the same species—and the name for that species is Homo sapiens,” Hawks says. “Why don’t we recognize that they’re the same species, and all these fossils going back to the common ancestor are representatives of that evolving species?”

Bailey also isn’t sure that Homo bodoensis brings clarity to this phase of human evolution. Given that the fossils seem to belong to a direct ancestor to Homo sapiens, she says, “Why don’t we just call that archaic Homo sapiens?” 

Nonetheless, Bailey says, the paper makes a good case for ditching Homo heidelbergensis and Homo rhodesiensis. “It also provides readers with kind of a glimpse into just how complex human evolution is, that it’s not this ladder-like [process in which] we evolved step-by-step into ‘Tada, we’re Homo sapiens!’”

The names we give bygone hominins reveal how we see them fitting into our family tree—and what makes the humans alive today unique. “That’s what people care about: what’s ‘us,’ when did we evolve, when did we develop the things we associate as being special about us?” Bailey says. 

Names allow us to understand the relationships between different hominin lineages and how they interacted, Hawks says, but they needn’t be set in stone. 

“It’s good to have these conversations,” he says. “Looking at the way that we describe groups, it’s really important to continue to have critical thinking about what are we accomplishing by naming them?”

How To Get Facebook Fans: The Easy Way And The Hard Way

Have you ever found an easy and superior way to do something, then watched in bafflement as people insist on doing it the hard way?

There are two main obstacles to people using Facebook Advertising:

Let’s tackle both issues…

1. Why It’s Foolish Not to Budget For Facebook Ads

Prioritizing Your Online Marketing Efforts:

AdWords reaches a point of diminishing return. Once you’ve established what keywords you can get a good ROI on, spend the rest of your budget on the lower priorities.

Every site reaches a point where they frankly don’t deserve to rank for more competitive terms. Even expanding your content with your blog only goes so far. Keep blogging, and move on to Facebook.

Facebook now gets more pageviews than Google. You can capture a targeted audience and, like an email list, market to them repeatedly. It’s way better than Twitter for B2C marketing

Twitter gets only 5% the reach of Facebook, but it’s great for networking, reaching bloggers and journalists, and B2B marketing.

He is amazing, so if the previous channels didn’t work, you’d better get in touch with the street magician.

Free Facebook Fans Suck

Don’t go to Facebook just because you don’t have a budget for AdWords. It really sucks to try to get fans the free route.

Yes, you can get 50 of your friends to fan your page. No that’s probably not your target market.

Yes you can run contests, but these fans will all be cheap – as in, they want free or low cost stuff. They’ll discount you to death. Red ocean, anyone?

Yes, you can create a video that you call “viral” but unless it gets thousands or millions of views, it wasn’t really viral. Viral marketing is nearly impossible to do on purpose.

Cheap Fan Services?

You can even get some company in India to get you really cheap fans, but I keep hearing from regretful business owners who look at their Page Insights and find these fans are from countries they don’t serve. They may even be fake profiles, which means they won’t interact with you and they’ll water down your Post Feedback Rate. I’m not saying anything as sweeping as companies from India are unethical, but I am saying that you need to watch out for these super-cheap fan services and check up on the fan quality if you do feel you need to go this route.

How To Get Good, Cheap Fans Who May Actually Buy From You

If you haven’t been into the Facebook Advertising interface, maybe you don’t understand how incredible the targeting is:





Relationship Status

Sexual gender preference


Interest targeting

Page targeting

Yes, interest targeting is different from keyword targeting, but that’s another issue. We’re just trying to get you the right fans- people who would buy your product or service if they knew about it.

2. How to Do Facebook Advertising Affordably

Also similar to an AdWords mistake. In AdWords we group keywords tightly and make the ad fit them – same deal with Facebook Ads.

If you use CPC when you should be using CPM, your cost can be 25 times higher.

Remember, this is FACEbook. If you’re not testing faces, think about it. Also, a 110×80 image is pretty small, so you may need to zoom in closer than you think. Oh, and by the way, hot woman are not always the best choice.

Assume you’ll get 3 seconds of the ad viewer’s time – less than AdWords. Make it snappy.

If you fix those six things, you’ll be ahead of the curve. If you want to learn more, check out my FanReach training.

How Much Do Fans Cost?

Based on my own experience, which includes about 25 companies in addition to another 15 or so case studies I’ve seen from several other Facebook marketers I work with, here is the range I target and expect:

Business to Consumer: $0.003 – $0.35 per fan; three fans per penny is the cheapest I’ve ever seen. I’d expect an average of about $0.15 per fan

Business to Business: $0.50 – $2.00 per fan; you may be able to go lower, but this is what I’ve seen. However, B2B offerings can be higher revenue, so it may still all work out for you with good margin.

However, not every business is ideal for Facebook Marketing. If you can’t find a discernable passion your audience has in common, they probably don’t “like” anything you can target cheaply enough.

Also, every niche is different, every business is different. As you may know with AdWords, two businesses targeting the same keywords can get dramatically different results because of their brand, offerings, and websites. It’s the same with Facebook Marketing.

Go ye and get likes wisely.

Photo Credits: Jester by CarbonNYC, David Blaine by Nikstar*, Crazy Sexy Cheap by redgoober4life

Skype Voicemail Lets Voip Users Leave Messages

Skype Voicemail Lets VOIP Users Leave Messages

Skype Voicemail was launched this week on the popular VOIP network. Skype Voicemail allows customers to continually maintain their Skype availability while offline by the ability to leave unlimited Voicemail messages for all Skype users when they are unavailable or offline, and can receive Voicemails from any caller. I don’t consider myself a Skype head but use Skype daily for making International calls (and some domestic calls) and was quite thrilled to hear that there is a new voicemail service for the VOIP solution.

Louis Philip of chúng tôi did a nice little write up of Skype functions. Philip writes about the world of Skype and maintains one of the largest Skype resource sites on the web : Skype is free, Skype is easy to use and Skype works. All you have to do is download, install and start using it. It is completely painless. If you are like me, you will start using Skype because you want to stop paying for long distance. My mother lives in the Czech Republic. In the Czech Republic it costs a lot of money to call North America. I told her to get Skype, now she calls me all time. Good thing Skype has VoiceMail!

After you get used to paying nothing for long distance, you will begin discovering some of Skype’s other options. As of June, 2005 Skype has the following options:

1) You can get Skype Voicemail for ~19$ a year (that is about ~1.50$ per month)

2) You can call almost any phone number on the planet for 2 cents a minute, half of what Vonage charges! (Skype to Skype calls are free)

3) You can get an incoming phone number for around ~40$ a year (that is only 3.50$ per month and they throw in voicemail for free! Remember, unlike Vonage which gives you a phone number when you agree to pay the 15$-25$ a month, Skype starts you off for free but will only give you a phone number when you start paying them 3.50$ a month. I started off using Skype for free since I was only making Skype to Skype calls at first)

4) You get a bunch of features included for free (conference calling, Caller ID, Call Waiting …)

5) There are tons of add-ons (also know as plug-ins) for Skype, many of them are free. You can get a Skype Answering machine, you can have Skype integrated into Microsoft Outlook or you can even start Podcasting with Skype.

6) There are lots of Skype communities. You can meet people for fun and conversation, you can even meet people to learn new languages.

7) Last, but not least, Skype has instant messaging and file sharing.

Once you get going with Skype you will find that it starts to grow on you. I haven’t replaced my regular phone with Skype, but it has become my second phone line and I use it frequently. At work I use Skype all the time. Since I’m already sitting at my computer it is much more convenient to talk with my team members using Skype than picking up the phone and giving them a call.

The Best Apple Iphone 6S Cases You Can Buy

See also: How to switch from iPhone to Android: Sync your contacts, photos, and more!

As with any six-year-old phone, it’s become tough to track down too many cases. We’ve included the best that we can find, but you may notice an iPhone 7 case here and there. Don’t worry, as the two phones share the same dimensions, the iPhone 6s just has a smaller camera.

The best iPhone 6s cases:

Editor’s note: We’ll add to this list as we find other iPhone 6s cases, and we’ll be sure to remove sold-out options.

Speck Presidio Stay Clear


Apple rolled out a solid selection of metallic finishes for the iPhone 6s, so why not show them off? The Presidio Stay Clear from Speck is completely transparent, and it’s almost completely free of branding. It’s drop-tested for up to eight feet thanks to the dual-layer Impactium construction. Speck also boasts that its iPhone 6s case should avoid discoloration thanks to a dot matrix pattern.

Spigen Ultra Hybrid


Few manufacturers offer more cases on a model-to-model basis than Spigen. The Ultra Hybrid is one of our favorites of the bunch, and you can get it completely clear or with a matte bumper. This iPhone 6s case combines a flexible TPU bumper with a stiff back panel for great protection against drops and scratches. You should even be able to apply the case in just a few seconds.

Ringke Fusion iPhone 6s case


The Ringke Fusion is a good bet if you want a MIL-STD 810G certification to go along with your transparent protection. It’s a sleek case with durable button covers, and the back panel now features a scratch-resistant coating. Ringke’s Fusion even comes with Quik Catch holes in case you want to add a lanyard or a wrist strap.

See also: The best Ringke cases you can buy

OCase iPhone 6s wallet case


Apple’s iPhone 6s won’t put too much pressure on your pocket, but sometimes it’s nice to free up space anyway. The OCase wallet offers three card slots and a cash pocket so you can leave your old wallet behind. You can choose from a few faux leather finishes, and the folio cover can fold around to double as a kickstand. OCase even throws in a free screen protector for good measure.

Otterbox Defender


No matter what phone you buy, the Otterbox Defender is always a good case to consider. It’s incredibly tough, and it’s been tested far beyond the MIL-STD 810G requirements. The Defender is one of the thicker options on our list, but it offers a built-in screen protector and tough button covers to keep your ports debris-free. You can choose from black, Seacrest, and Indigo Harbor finishes.

Lifeproof Fre


If you’re hoping to take your iPhone 6s for a swim, then a Lifeproof case may be in order. Lifeproof takes things a step further than Otterbox and completely seals your phone from the elements. The case even uses a screw-in cover to guard your headphone jack against dust and splashes. It comes in black, Banzai, Avalanche, Sunset, and Crushed if you want to add a pop of color.

Spigen Tough Armor


The Tough Armor brings up the rear on our iPhone 6s case list, and it’s another classic Spigen offering. It combines a tough polycarbonate shell with a soft TPU bumper for maximum impact protection. You can choose from either black or gunmetal finishes, and the raised bezels should give you some peace of mind when you set your phone down.

Crucial T700 Ssd Review: Record


Breathtaking performance

Available with or without heatsink

Up to 4TB in capacity


Extremely pricey

Requires the still rare PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot

Our Verdict

Crucial’s T700 shattered all our benchmark and real world records, and did so by a rather wide margin. If your system features a PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot, this SSD will take your storage performance to another level.

Best Prices Today: Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD

Nothing revs a storage reviewer’s engine more than a large jump in mainstream performance. Hitting that long skinny pedal for me was Crucial’s T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD, which transferred data a full gigabyte-per-second faster than any SSD we’ve tested to date. All I can say is, “Yowser!”

Crucial T700 price, design, and specs

The T700 is available in 1TB, 2TB (tested), and 4TB capacities. It’s sold bare or with a rather beefy heatsink for $180/$210, $340/$370, $600/$620, respectively. Alas, that’s nearly twice as expensive as some very good PCIe 4.0 competition, though you’re paying for a genuine leap in performance (see below). Note that those are pre-release prices provided by Crucial, so you might find it cheaper after launch. Look around.

Further reading: See our roundup of the best SSDs to learn about competing products.

The Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD without heatsink.

Jon Jacobi / Foundry

As to the optional heatsink, most users will be fine without it, but if you’re going to pound on the drive in a system with lots of other heat-producing components, it couldn’t hurt.

The T700’s 2280 (22mm wide, 80mm long) form factor uses the brand-new Phison PS5026-E26 controller and Micron’s own 232-layer, TLC NAND. (Crucial is a Micron brand). There’s 1GB of DDR4 primary cache for every 1TB of capacity.

The TBW (terabytes that may be written) rating for the T700 is 600TB per terabyte of capacity. If you weren’t aware, TBW is the mitigating factor in SSD warranties, (five years in this case), as miles are to the years in an automobile warranty.

How does the Crucial T700 perform?

The T700 destroyed the field, including the recently reviewed, formerly fastest Gigabyte Gen5 10,000. We’re truly talking an entirely new level of performance, which held fast in the real-world tests to a far greater degree than the Gigabyte SSD. I could go on, but instead—check out the gold bars in the charts below.

The T700 dominated the CrystalDiskMark 8 tests and it wasn’t particularly close. Longer bars are better.

Note that the WD SN850X is a PCIe 4.0 drive included for comparison. It’s among the fastest 4.0 SSDs we’ve tested and was re-tested on our latest test bed. (See the “How we test” section at the end of this article.)

One thing we observed is that formatting the T700 is a tad slow compared to many NVMe SSDs, regardless of PCIe revision. But who cares when you can shave the better part of a minute off a 48GB file transfer and 40 seconds off a 450GB write, as we found?

We’re truly talking an entirely new level of performance, which held fast in the real-world tests.


Crucial T700’s 48GB transfers showed great improvement in the real world, unlike the

Gigabyte. Shorter bars are better.

Jon L. Jacobi

Note that the 450GB write test is currently using a PCIe 4.0 drive to feed the file to the other drives. We’ll be addressing this soon now that we have several PCIe 5.0 SSDs in house, but regardless, the T700 once again destroyed the competition by a good 40 seconds.

The T700 shaved a full 40 seconds off the Gigabyte PCIe 5’s 450GB write time. That’s bookin’. Shorter bars are better.

Because of the slightly insane numbers popping up, the test experience with the T700 was just a general hoot. So much so that I also installed a couple of operating systems on it, and they felt snappier. Not a huge difference, but noticeable.

Is the Crucial T700 worth it?

The T700 is absolutely the current king of the hill, and it’s not even a particularly close contest. If you have the required PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot, it’s the NVMe SSD you want—assuming you have the required monetary wherewithal to pay for the privilege.

How we test

Internal drive tests currently utilize Windows 11 (22H2) 64-bit running on an X790 (PCIe 5.0) motherboard/i5-12400 CPU combo with two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 modules (64GB of memory total). Intel integrated graphics are used. The 48GB transfer tests utilize an ImDisk RAM disk taking up 58GB of the 64GB total memory. The 450GB file is transferred from a Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, which also contains the operating system.

Each test is performed on a newly formatted and TRIM’d drive so the results are optimal. Note that as any drive fills up, performance will decrease due to less NAND for secondary caching, and other factors.

The performance numbers shown apply only to the drive we were shipped as well as the capacity tested. SSD performance can vary by capacity due to more or fewer chips to read/write across and the amount of NAND available for secondary caching (writing TLC/QLC as SLC). Vendors also occasionally swap components. If you ever notice a large discrepancy between the performance you experience and that which we report (systems being roughly equal), by all means—let us know.

Update the detailed information about The Clever Way Apple Lets You Record Time on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!