Trending February 2024 # This Is How Big The Rumored Apple Watch Pro Could Really Be # Suggested March 2024 # Top 3 Popular

You are reading the article This Is How Big The Rumored Apple Watch Pro Could Really Be updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 This Is How Big The Rumored Apple Watch Pro Could Really Be

Leaked Apple Watch Pro cases show how big Apple’s rugged smartwatch will be due to its display, which measures 49mm versus a 45mm screen on the Series 7.

What’s happening? Photographs of protective cases for Apple Watch Pro, the company’s rumored rugged model, illustrate exactly how big the device is.

Why care? Because Apple Watch Pro should file as the biggest Apple Watch to date and you’re eager to learn how it might fit your wrist.

What to do? Tune in to Apple’s event tomorrow and follow iDownloadBlog for announcements of the next iPhone, Apple Watch Series and AirPods.

Leaked case images demonstrate Apple Watch Pro size

Australian leaker Sony Dickson on Twitter shared images of protective cases that accessory makers have produced based on their own leaked CAD drawings.

Assuming those technical drawings and CAD renders are correct, Apple Watch Pro will be noticeably bigger on your wrist than any current model.

The image at the top of the post illustrates exactly how big the upcoming Apple Watch Pro might really be. The picture’s bottom half shows, from left to right: A black protective case for the 49mm size of Apple Watch Pro, a 41mm protective case for Apple Watch Series 8 and one for last year’s Apple Watch Series 7.

The Apple Watch Pro display size should be 1.99 inches diagonally. By comparison, the 41mm version of the current Apple Watch Series 7 has a 1.691-inch display while its 45mm counterpart is equipped with a 1.901-inch one.

— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) September 5, 2023

According to Bloomberg’s reliable reporter Mark Gurman, Apple Watch Pro will have a flat display and round sides. Mark also says there will be new bands made specifically for the Apple Watch Pro that will “play into the extreme sports theme.” On top of that, there might be “some pretty info dense faces for fitness metrics.”

Who’s ready for the biggest Apple Watch to date?

Mark Gurman, Bloomberg’s reliable reporter on the Apple beat, has described a rugged Apple Watch Pro as Apple’s biggest smartwatch to date.

Another possibility is Apple keeps the SE price for the SE 2 and then retains the original Watch SE at a lower price. But given the similarities that seems unlikely. It would also be odd if Apple doesn’t discontinue the regular iPhone 13 given the similarities to the regular 14.

— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) September 6, 2023

With a seven percent larger screen measuring 49mm, the rumored Apple Watch Pro would be “a good bit bigger” than the current Apple Watch Series 7, whose screen measures 45mm. Even though it “won’t have those rumored flat sides,” Gurman insists the device’s display will “be bigger than most wrists.”

Leaked CAD renders, seen above, indicate that a rugged Apple Watch could also feature a programmable button on the lefthand side that the user might assign to different functions, such as starting a specific workout. In addition, this model could have a protrusion on the righthand side with both the Digital Crown and Side button embedded into it. Read: 30+ things to do after buying an Apple Watch

You're reading This Is How Big The Rumored Apple Watch Pro Could Really Be

Apple Watch Could Slim Down With This Interesting New Patent

Apple Watch could slim down with this interesting new patent

The Apple Watch could get a little bit slimmer in future iterations if ideas in a new Apple patent ever see the light of day. The patent application in question details a haptic motor that takes up residence in the band of the watch instead of the watch itself.

This could do something to solve the problem of space within the Apple Watch. As we’ve seen with recent versions of the iPhone, Apple likes to make its devices as thin as it can, but because it has to fit all of the Apple Watch hardware within a relatively tiny space, slimming it down becomes more difficult. By applying this patent and moving the motor responsible for haptic feedback to the band, it could open up some addition space within the Watch.

Apple breaks down the idea pretty well in the patent application, but even without a detailed overview, the idea is pretty straightforward. The patent application discusses putting haptic sensors within attachment mechanisms – either the mechanisms that attach the band to the watch, or the clasp that attaches the band (and therefore the device as a whole) to the user, moving the haptic sensor to the underside of the wrist.

Going even further, the patent suggests generating the haptic feedback within the band itself. Essentially, there are a few different ways Apple considers implementing this idea, so the patent application covers a lot of ground. It also suggests either a wireless or wired connection between the sensor and processor:

The electronic device can be in communication with the one or more haptic devices through a wired and/or wireless connection. In some embodiments, a remote electronic device can be in communication with the electronic device attached to the wearable band and the remote electronic device can activate or deactivate a haptic response in one or more attachment mechanisms associated with the wearable band.

In addition to using this patent to make the watch thinner, Apple could also choose to keep the size of the Apple Watch the same and add additional components. As it stands right now, the size of the current Apple Watch is roughly on par with more conventional watches, so it doesn’t necessarily need to get thinner. Apple could instead use that space to increase the size of the battery, giving the Apple Watch extended life.

While this would allow for increased functionality within the band, one downside is that it could also make buying additional bands a more expensive endeavor. That could be offset by perhaps decreasing the cost of other Apple Watch hardware, but there’s no guarantee Apple would go that route. Still, at this point, it’s probably too early to speculate on any price changes this patent would bring forth.

It’s an interesting patent to be sure, and the full text can be found via the source link below. Considering that a new Apple Watch just launched a few months back, we likely won’t see this technology implemented for quite some time, if it’s even implemented at all. Still, there’s always the possibility that we’ll see such a band in the next Apple Watch model, assuming Apple moves forward with the idea.

SOURCE: US Patent and Trademark Office

How Durable Is The Apple Watch Ultra?

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority

Modern smartwatches must withstand much daily abuse, even more so if used in extreme situations. Garmin has long offered these users rugged devices for use outdoors. More recently, Apple has joined this segment with the Apple Watch Ultra. But just how durable is the Ultra, and how far can it be pushed? We have the answer below.

How does this compare to other smartwatches?

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority

Its use of high-end materials ensures that the Apple Watch Ultra finds itself among stellar company.

The Apple Watch Ultra has a massive leg up with deep water credentials. Garmin and Samsung do not recommend users scuba dive with their aforementioned devices. The HUAWEI GT 3 Pro has a free diving sports mode, but the device is only suitable for dives of up to 30 meters, while the Suunto 9 Peak Pro’s depth meter tops out at 10 meters.

What does it take to break the Apple Watch Ultra?

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority

The Apple Watch Ultra isn’t just a pretty face. It seems that Apple was rather conservative in outlining its limitations.

Water pressure

Let’s talk about diving pressures first. Device reviewer DC Rainmaker pushed the device to the limit in a pressure chamber to simulate deep water dives. While the Apple Watch Ultra displays a “Beyond 130ft” warning on its screen when reaching that depth and beyond, this isn’t a hardware issue. Instead, it seems that Apple is sticking to the recommended depth of a recreational dive.

The actual simulated depth during the test was 159 feet or 48.5 meters — 8.5 meters over Apple’s 40-meter guideline. More impressively, the watch was fully functional after the test. You’ll unlikely damage the Apple Watch Ultra during a recreational dive.

Drops and scratches

You won’t have to worry too much about dropping your Apple Watch Ultra from hand height. YouTuber TechRax did just that on a paved driveway. The watch’s screen was undamaged, but the chassis did show pitting and scratch damage. The YouTuber also rattled the watch around in a bottle full of screws and nails to simulate… something. Again, the device showed no signs of critical damage.

For more realistic conditions, ZDNet‘s Matthew Miller put the Apple Watch Ultra through the Tough Mudder. This obstacle-filled endurance marathon includes “an ice-cold water pool full of shocking ‘Electric Eels’ and mountains of mud-filled barricades.” It sounds like a fun weekend out, so how did the Apple Watch Ultra do? “To my surprise, it held up really well and I still cannot believe that the display is flawless,” wrote Miller.

Blunt force

In the same video, TechRax hammered the Apple Watch after it survived the drop tests. Impressively, the device endured several violent hits directly to the lens, but the table the watch is sitting on broke first. After around 12 hits, the Apple Watch Ultra’s display switched off, but the lens remained unscratched. This suggests a component within the watch broke before the chassis or lens. That’s pretty remarkable.

YouTube channel iupdate also tested the Ultra’s shock resistance against the Series 8. The two watches were put through a series of extreme “tests.” Both devices mostly survived general durability tests, including falling, rock and gravel rubbing, and river soaking. The Series 8 came out rather injured, with several scratches and dings to its lens. The Ultra was mostly untainted.

More extreme tests included smashing both devices against a wall. The Series 8 broke immediately. The Ultra endured 38 throws against the road before the titanium chassis displayed weakness. After “50 impacts,” the device was still functional, bar a few dead pixels. It failed two smashes later.

How easy is the Apple Watch to repair?

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority

Of course, if you’re planning to smash you device against a mountain face for a few hours, you may have to have your Apple Watch Ultra repaired. But how possible is this, and how much will it cost?

According to iFixit, the Apple Watch Ultra is among the more tricky wearables to fix. While there’s considerably less strong adhesive in use, and the presence of screws is a welcome sight for home tinkerers, the screen is difficult to remove and battery replacement is also particularly tricky.

If you aren’t interested in fixing your own watch (highly understandable), Apple offers Ultra repairs at a premium. You’ll pay $99 for a battery replacement, while “other damage” will cost $499 without AppleCare Plus or $79 with it.

Is the Apple Watch Ultra worth buying?


Screen protectors are always a good idea, but the Apple Watch Ultra likely won’t require additional protection for its sapphire crystal lens.

Apart from its rugged build, the Apple Watch Ultra also sports a larger battery than any other Apple Watch. In addition, it features dual-frequency GPS, a depth meter and water temperature sensor for diving, unique features for hikers, a skin temperature sensor, and a programmable Action button.

Yes. All Apple Watch Ultra models feature LTE connectivity, but you must pay for the data plan separately.

Tested: This Is The Leather Backpack For Macbook Pro That Apple Would Make

If Apple made a leather backpack for MacBook Pro models, I’m pretty sure it would look and feel a lot like the Harber London Slim Laptop Backpack.

Regular readers will know I’m a sucker for premium leather bags, and I’m an equal opportunity guy when it comes to different leather styles and finishes. But if you look at things like Apple’s leather sleeve for the MacBook Pro, it’s clear that the company favors extremely smooth and soft leather, at a price that reflects the quality – and that’s exactly what we get with this backpack …

It’s available in two sizes, one for 13- to 14-inch laptops, the other for 15- to 16-inch ones. I tested the larger of the two, which comfortably accommodates my 16-inch MacBook Pro, alongside my 12.9-inch iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard in a separate slot.

Look and feel

The backpack measures around 16 inches high by 11 inches wide by 2 inches deep. The shallow depth is deliberate: The pack is designed to hold a laptop and a few other bits and pieces, and to do so in as little space as possible.

It’s made from full-grain cowhide leather, in a choice of three colors: tan, black, and deep brown. The quality of the leather is absolutely first-rate. It’s a very smooth-looking leather and is buttery-soft to the touch. This is one aspect to which a review can never do justice, but if you’re familiar with Apple’s leather MacBook or iPad sleeves, it has a very similar finish and feel to those.

The main stitching is internal, and the visible stitching around the zips, exterior compartment, and backpack straps is really neat. Both zips are protected by rubber strips that completely hide the zip when closed.

This is a very expensive bag, but it really looks and feels the part.

Inside, there are two main slots, plus pockets for smartphone, cables, and so on. The smartphone slot is large enough to hold an iPhone 12 Pro Max. There’s a separate compartment on the outside of the bag with room for a power brick and cables.

In addition to the backpack straps, there’s a rear handle, and a slot for using it on a wheeled cabin bag.

In use

The backpack straps are comfortable, and the very slim design means you completely avoid the biggest drawback to backpacks: the danger of hitting someone or something when turning around.

There’s no leisure air travel in or out of the UK at present, but having used a similar slim backpack in the past, I’m confident that the bag would fit on top of a cabin bag in an overhead locker.

Of course, the two-inch depth does mean this is strictly a tech bag. A MacBook, an iPad, an iPhone, a few cables, and a power brick. This is not a general-purpose backpack, so you can forget any ideas about throwing in a water bottle and a sweater.

Pricing and conclusions

In US dollars, the 13- to 14-inch version costs $390, while the 15- to 16-inch version costs $418. Both come with free worldwide shipping.

That’s very expensive. But, given the quality, and the fact that Apple charges $199 just for a sleeve made from similar leather, I don’t think it’s out of line. This is a bag that stands up against some very well-known designer brands in terms of both look and feel. Whether it’s worth the money is a very subjective question, but I don’t think it has any problem justifying its price.

The slim design means that the Harber London backpack is definitely not the thing to buy if you’re a one-backpack person. But if, like me, you have different bags for different functions and occasions, this is a really great option to have when you want a comfortable way to carry a MacBook Pro and little else.

I also suspect it may become my standard second carry-on bag when we can travel again. The slim size means it’s not going to get any argument from airline staff about whether it qualifies as a laptop bag; the slot to fit over a roller-bag handle makes it super-convenient in airports; and a backpack is a more useful thing than a briefcase-style bag when wandering around at the destination.

The Harber London Slim Laptop Backpack is available in two sizes and three colors. It can be ordered from the company’s website, with pricing in a range of currencies, and free worldwide shipping.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Is Adobe Premiere Pro Really Easy To Learn?

Of course yes! Well, it does depend on how dedicated you are and how well you really want to learn it. But if you are committed, in just three days, you can be a PRO.

I am Dave. A professional video editor and an expert in Adobe Premiere Pro. I’ve been editing for the past 10 years and yes, you guessed right, I am still editing! I can boldly tell you that I know the nukes and crannies of Adobe Premiere.

In this article, I am going to explain how easy it is to learn Adobe Premiere, how to get started, and finally where you can find the tutorials and courses to get you started.

Is It Really Easy to Learn Adobe Premiere

My answer remains YES! It doesn’t take long to become a pro with Adobe Premiere. Once you get hold of your tools and panel knowledge, you’re good to go.

You only have to understand what each tool does, what each panel does, and the basic effects to apply to your clips. The Basic Effects include:

Color Correction: Lumetri Color

Transform Effect

Crop Effect

Audio and Video Transitions

How to Get Started with Adobe Premiere

Well, you have to buy the software and install it on your PC or Mac, that’s the first step to greatness. Learning doesn’t take place when it’s not being applied. As you learn, you practice. To get started, you have to understand the following:

The Interface

1. Timeline: This is where you going to perform all your magics, add effects, texts, graphics, overlays, footages, b-rolls anything that you can actually think of. All is done here. It’s very easy to understand the timeline.

2. Project Folder: This is where you are going to organize all your files, be it videos, audios, images, anything you want to bring into Adobe Premiere Pro, you can simply drag and drop into the Project Folder.

3. The Effects Panel: You select any kind of effect you want to apply to any of your clip here; crop, transform, lumetri color, ultra key, etc. They all live here.

4. The Effect Control Panel: As its name implies, you get to control your effects here, keyframe it, etc.

5. The Esssential Graphics Panel: All your texts are controlled here. Choosing font styles, font colors, adding motion to your texts, all are done here.

6. The Lumetri Color: You perform all the color magic here. Color correction, color grading. It’s a really fantastic panel which you can’t do without as time goes on.

The list goes on, but these are the basics, once you get a full understanding of all these panels, there’s no way you’re not a pro!

Move Tool: This is the most basic tool in any program. You get to move things around with it. Anything literally.

Cut/Splice Tool: More or less like a knife. You get to cut any of your clips with this “sharp” tool.

Text Tool: Simply type in text, you get it.

Shape Tool: To draw shapes, shapes like rectangles, circles, rounded rectangles, squares, etc.

Pen Tool: It has numerous uses. Used for drawing basically, you can draw with this tool. Also used for masking.

And more and more tools, but once you know the above-named tools, you’re on track already.

Export Section

Now, you are done with your project, you’ve saved it up and you are very pleased with yourself but how are you gonna show it to the world? You’re not gonna send the Adobe Premiere file to your family and friends.

You have to export or “render” your project, and export in an extension that people will be able to view. Extensions like “.mp4, .mov, .avi, etc”. Once you get this right, you’re good to go. We already covered this in our previous article, you can come back to it.

Where to Learn Premiere Pro

Guessed you are still very much interested in embarking on this great journey but ops! You don’t have a mentor, you don’t know where to start. I’m happy to tell you that you can start on either of the following:

YouTube: There are numerous free content out there on youtube. Browse and search for the best content! But how do you know the best content, well, just preview them all, once it touches all the categories mentioned above, you can start with it. You don’t have to settle only for one channel, go through numerous channels, watch and learn different strategies.


Now you should know it is really easy to learn Adobe Premiere. Very easy I mean. Just make sure you’re learning the right thing. I wish you good luck as you embark on this journey. 

Making The Grade: Is Macos Really Less Stable Than It Used To Be?

I’ve been managing macOS in an enterprise environment since 2009, so I was around during the “stable” periods of Snow Leopard, as well as what others would call unstable periods. One of the common themes I’ve heard in my technology circles over the past few years is that macOS has become less stable. I manage 100s of Mac laptops at the moment, and I would estimate I’ve been responsible for 1,000+ devices over the past ten years. So, I think I’m qualified to discuss the current state of macOS stability.

Apple has been on the yearly upgrade cycle for macOS for a few years now, so it feels like by the time we get the X.4 revision of a new version of macOS, we are getting ready to kick off a summer of running betas (for IT to prepare for compatibility) and then kick off a fall season of updates and 1.0 bugs.

What’s the current state of macOS stability?

While I don’t have data to quantify it internally, I do know that I spend a lot less time on laptop support than I used to. A lot of my time is spent managing SaaS products instead. Some of it could be that our users are savvier than they used to be, but I generally think macOS is as stable today as it was back in the Snow Leopard days. I know that is not the common perception, though. If you stop and think about how our technology world was in the “stable” days of macOS, there was no iPad, no iCloud, no iMessage, no iCloud Photos, no Apple Music, and no Apple Watch. We had an iPhone, a laptop, and we used a cable to sync them together. Our world was a lot less in flux. Now, we’ve got 4K videos we are syncing over iCloud Photos while countless GIFs transfer over iMessage. We are more complex, and that creates a lot of opportunities for things to be out of sync.

In my opinion, it’s not that the stability of macOS has changed, but rather that we expect so much more from our software than we ever have. If we went back to only features and services available in 2009, I think we’d find that all modern computing platforms are “stable” by those measurements.

Why does restarting a computer fix most things?

I had not thought about this before a recent episode of Reconcilable Differences. Merlin Mann made a great point: restarting a computer puts everything back to a known state. The problem with our current technology stack is there is no way to reboot “the cloud”. A lot of people have 4+ devices that access the same amount of data, and there are countless ways for things to not work. In fact, when I realize how many devices I have accessing my Wi-Fi and/or iCloud Data, I am surprised it even works half the time.


Stability was a key feature in iOS 12 and macOS Mojave. Both operating systems launched to much fanfare among people who were craving a year with fewer features and more bug fixes. It would be wise for Apple to repeat that process every couple of years. It would give their engineering teams time to breathe and work on long-range plans.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Update the detailed information about This Is How Big The Rumored Apple Watch Pro Could Really Be on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!