Trending February 2024 # You Get What You Pay For # Suggested March 2024 # Top 2 Popular

You are reading the article You Get What You Pay For updated in February 2024 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 You Get What You Pay For

You Get What You Pay For

There’s a serious lack of expertise in Web 2.0. Take the new Forbes magazine online format, for instance. As Paul Carr reports on TechCrunch, Forbes is going ‘crowd-sourced.’ The site is going to use content from thousands of contributors, possibly unpaid volunteer writers, and, as Forbes editor David M. Ewalt tells Carr, “Forbes editors will increasingly become curators of talent.”

I worked for a site in the late 90s called eTown. It was made up of former freelance journalists. I was a production associate, but I also got to pitch review ideas. I remember offering to review a nice set of headphones and being roundly rebuffed. I was not qualified. I had no audiophile training. I could review more casual products, but certain categories required real expertise. Television sets, audio equipment, that sort of thing.

eTown went down in a blaze of glory, laying off the entire staff in one fell swoop and failing to pay the last paychecks. That was on Valentine’s day, no less. In the end, the real value in the site was not the editorial content, but the massive product database that the company had created, with specs, feature listing and photographs. Perhaps content was never really respected, even from the start of the Internet boom.

I have respect for Gizmodo, even though they have a well-deserved reputation for acting and writing immaturely. Their best work is their original reporting and features. They took a week-long trip to the Lego factory a while back that was fascinating, original and exclusive. I did not follow their liveblog of the Apple keynote because I saw no value in it. If they had sent their own experienced reporters, like SlashGear and Gdgt did, among many others, I would have followed them. But without expertise, what’s the point? How can they compete?

I’ve reviewed thousands of products since I started working in this industry. Mostly cell phones. I don’t build phones or design phones, but I still have some expertise in the field. I’ve spent quality time with every major phone release in the past four years. Every phone that costs $50 or more, I’ve gotten hands on and probably spent a few days exploring every feature and using it like you would normally use a phone on a very busy weekend. I frequently talk with the manufacturers, the OS developers, the retailers and others involved in the industry. I’ve attended classes and workshops, sat on panel discussions and waited on long lines with consumers waiting for the next big thing.

I don’t think I’m better than my reader, or that my opinion is more valid because of the work I’ve put in. I do think I have more experience with cell phones than most consumers. I’ve put in the work so that you don’t have to. When I write my opinion about a device, I’m an expert because of the time I’ve spent and the questions I can answer.

When I read a review or a news story online, or even a recipe, I want it to be written by someone like me. Someone who has spent the time to understand the issue. Someone who has asked the questions I might ask, and then some of the questions I wouldn’t think of asking. Someone with experience.

It can be fun participating in a more social discussion, but not when I need the opinion of experts. I love arguing politics because I don’t have a dog in that fight. I’m not a politician, and beyond voting and a few loud rallies, I’m not going to be politically active. But I will definitely buy a cell phone in the next year. I will definitely invest my money and plan for a distant retirement. I will definitely be cooking dinner for my wife’s birthday.

I think there will be a backlash among readers if expertise vanishes. If you buy a phone based on my positive review and it turns out to be a real stinker, or if I missed some major problem that’s important to you, you definitely won’t read my review the next time you want to buy something. On the other hand, once you’ve learned to trust me and my opinions about consumer electronics, you won’t have to sort through a thousand different opinions before you get to the one that’s valuable.

You're reading You Get What You Pay For

How Many Subscription Services Do You Pay For?

Is Apple a services company these days? It’s certainly possible to make that argument. And being in the Apple ecosystem probably means you pay for at least a couple of different options offered by the company. But with so many other offerings out there, it can be a task simply choosing which ones to keep.

I don’t know about you, but when it comes to some subscriptions out there ones are more of a “default” than others. The services you use on such a regular basis, or you’ve had for so long, that it’s just second nature to see the bill arrive every month. I’ve got two of those on a yearly basis: Netflix and Hulu. Those are my go-to options and, it seems, the services I won’t be giving up on anytime soon.

The same can be said for Apple Music, too. There’s not a day that goes by that I don’t listen to music, and while that used to be Spotify, Apple Music has been my default music streaming service of choice for at least a year now. I imagine iCloud fits into there, even if it’s not necessarily as heavily used.

And then from there, there are so many. Right now I’ve got HBO Max, Paramount+, chúng tôi AMC+ (which gives me access to AMC, Shudder, Sundance Now, and IFC Films Unlimited), ESPN+, Disney+, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, and Ulysses. And then I’ve got Tweetbot 6 on a yearly renewal. It’s certainly not a cheap experience, but the good news is that I can say I actually use all of these services enough to warrant the cost.

Actually, I’d probably be second guessing some of these if I actually had to fork over the money for every single one of them. As it stands right now I’ve got ESPN+, Disney+, and Hulu for free thanks to Verizon. I’ve got the same deal in place with Apple Music, too. So that saves me quite a bit, and make signing up for services like Showtime a little easier to deal with.

I’m trying to decide whether or not signing up for Apple One, which bundles a variety of Apple’s services together under one monthly payment. With the Premier option you get Apple Arcade, Apple Music, Apple TV+, 2TB of iCloud, Apple News+, and apple Fitness+. While I’ve technically got a subscription to Apple News+ right now, that’s a free trial that expires in April. I’m not sure that I’ll renew. And if I don’t, and I’m not sold on Apple Fitness+ being right for me, I don’t think the Apple One subscription is worth it.

Resource: How to get Apple One

Even with all of these services, the scary thing is that it’s probably still cheaper than some of us were paying for standard cable. And that doesn’t include the add-on packages that offered at the time. Even if I paid for all the services I actually use on a regular basis, I’d still be paying less than even the cable alternatives like YouTube TV. I can’t even imagine paying roughly $70 per month for TV anymore — I don’t miss that past at all.

Plus, I can pick and choose what content I want to access. A new show is getting a lot of attention on a streaming service I don’t have right now? Sure, I’ll sign up, binge it, and then drop the service when I’m done. I imagine that’s how my life with HBO Max is going to be, honestly. Probably Paramount+, too.

But how do you feel about all of these streaming services out there nowadays? How many are you paying for? How many do you get for free? And which of these services, no matter how big or small, are you the happiest with?

Can Iphones Get A Virus ? What You Need To Know About It

It is very difficult, if not almost impossible, to install malicious programs on the iPhone from sources other than the Apple Store since Apple is very concerned about the security of its operating systems. But note that iOS still has vulnerabilities, although the majority of them are rapidly fixed by the well-known brand. So is it possible to infect iPhones or not? Let’s figure it out.

How does iOS protect us from malware?

First, Apple designed iOS so that the user (unless they jailbreak) can only download apps from the company’s app store. In Android, as in Windows, you can install programs from anywhere – but you pay a high price for this because it’s very easy to “catch” a virus on the modern, not very user-friendly Internet.

Moreover, Apple’s censors manually check each individual application for viruses. If something suspicious is found in the program code, the application is returned for revision. 

Where can an iPhone user stumble upon a virus?

Despite the fact that Apple tech is awesome in terms of security, there are still many attackers attempting to infect iPhones. The scammers write directly to the potential victim, making casual conversation on dating sites or apps and social media. The attackers also send random messages on WhatsApp with investment and trading offers.

Gizchina News of the week

Join GizChina on Telegram

false messages sent in the name of Apple and other well-known companies; 

phone calls or voicemails purporting to be from Apple support; 

phony promotions promising free goods and prizes; 

dubious invitations to subscribe to whatever.

Don’t fall for these scammers. And this doesn’t just apply to iPhone users.

Don’t dismiss jailbreak

So, the average iPhone user will never see a virus on their smartphone if they don’t open malicious links and download dubious apps. But we haven’t talked about such a thing as a jailbreak yet.

Jailbreak gives you access to iOS administrator rights and allows you to bypass all Apple security restrictions. As a result, the user gets the opportunity to install applications from any source and change the system at will – in general, everything is like on Android.

This is the security hole. At the same time, many still buy hacked devices that have undergone jailbreak. Therefore, if you still doubt whether your iPhone may have a virus, we recommend checking it. How? Check here for more info.

So do I need an antivirus?

As you can see, antivirus for the iPhone is almost not needed – Apple has already taken care of you, and you won’t have to bear additional costs, and the existing security vulnerabilities can hardly be called viruses: and in order not to endanger the iPhone, it’s enough just not to install junky apps.

However, there are quite a few antiviruses in the App Store. Why are they needed if the risk of catching malware tends to zero?

As a rule, such applications help in finding a lost device and protect you and your digital identity from dangerous websites, unsecured Wi-Fi, ID theft, or hacking. Therefore, having such an application in the arsenal will not be superfluous.

Wrap up

So, is it possible to infect an iPhone with a virus? Theoretically, this is possible. But if you are a person of sound mind, your iPhone will never be infected with any virus.

Don’t jailbreak your iPhone, update iOS on time, install applications only from the App Store, and your smartphone will never catch malicious code because its protection against viruses is close to ideal. And if hackers suddenly find something, Apple will very quickly solve the problem and release a patch. Do not worry in vain – you have a very reliable device in terms of security.

What Do You Do When You Encounter Fake News?

Many people can get caught up in fake news, believing that it’s true, and that can cause many, many problems. This caused us to ask our writers, “What do you do when you encounter fake news?”

Our Opinion

Alex says he doesn’t see a lot of obviously fake news, but in regards to bad journalism, he believes “we have to apply the tools that everyone has in their skeptic’s toolbox.”

Fabio quite simply says he just ignores it and moves on.

Miguel explains “we’ve lived for thousands of years with more fake news than we see today, and it was better proliferated than the real stuff.” He believes that “the gravity of the problem hasn’t changed. Its coverage has.” He notes that when he encounters fake news, if it’s honest mistakes, he’ll “send a private and polite letter to the editor.” If he doesn’t care, he’ll ignore it. If a friend is sharing the story, he’ll mention his concerns privately to them.

Phil encourages his Facebook friends to use common sense. If it’s a reputable source, “they should be critical but assume there’s at least a grain of truth in it.” But if it’s something less reputable like “, then it should either be taken with a massive sack of salt or at least follows up on other sites.” He suggests if you don’t have time to follow up on the story or if no other source is carrying it, you can safely ignore it.

I actually write news articles, so I see this topic with a slightly different spin as a purveyor of news. I agree with what has been mentioned above about looking for sources. I always cite my sources and link back to them. The websites I reference are always the top websites. I learned really quickly which ones I should avoid. Recently three CNN journalists resigned after it was discovered they didn’t source their story really well. But because CNN was so on top of it and took care of it and pulled the story down right away, it makes me trust them more.

Your Opinion

What’s your take on this subject? Do you tend to ignore news that you deem as fake news? Do you let the authors of the stories know they are spreading fake news? Do you only read well-sourced news? What do you do when you encounter fake news?

Laura Tucker

Laura has spent nearly 20 years writing news, reviews, and op-eds, with more than 10 of those years as an editor as well. She has exclusively used Apple products for the past three decades. In addition to writing and editing at MTE, she also runs the site’s sponsored review program.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox

Sign up for all newsletters.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and European users agree to the data transfer policy. We will not share your data and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Onedrive Will Get New Sharing Features Soon: Here’s What You Need To Know

OneDrive will get new sharing features soon: Here’s what you need to know




Microsoft is preparing some big updates for OneDrive. As soon as the company revealed its roadmap for Office 365, we noticed a couple of interesting additions for every version of OneDrive, including OneDrive for Business and its web version.

Most of the improvements deal with OneDrive for Business’ sharing features. We’ve listed each notable change here, so you can find more information about the upcoming improvements in one place.

Simplified sharing from OneDrive for Business from the web

Microsoft will make the sharing experience in the web version of OneDrive for Business easier. The previously-established workflow of users emailing links or saving them to the clipboard will remain.

We’re updating the user experience for sharing files and folders in OneDrive for Business from the web.  This new sharing experience simplifies the flow of emailing links to colleagues and guests and copying links to the clipboard. Like the original experience, the new experience presents two choices to users who want to share: type email addresses to send a link in email, or copy a link to the clipboard. Both the “Share” and “Get a link” command support all three types of links in OneDrive, including anonymous access links (accessible by anyone), company shareable links (accessible to those within your organization) and restricted links (accessible to a custom set of users both in and outside your organization).

The revamped feature allows users to easily choose their sharing method. Microsoft already started rolling out this feature and is expected to be completed in by the end of February.

Dedicated OneDrive for Business Admin Console

Microsoft added a graphical user interface to the Office 365 Console to make management easier for admins.

One useful feature Microsoft will implement in the upcoming update is a success indicator for sending links. .

Today, when a user adds an ODB modern attachment, there’s no indication before sending that sharing with their recipients will work. We’re adding Sharing Tips to fix this by adding tips that warn you if sharing with your recipients will not work and provides a suggested action. In addition, Outlook will use the best URL for your situation – in most cases the Company sharing link.

Outlook on the web: OneDrive Sharing Improvements

Finally, Microsoft will be introducing more access levels, like “anyone can edit” and “anyone in my organization can edit.” That way, group admins will be in full control over users’ assignments within the project.

Today, modern attachments are shared by default with “recipients can edit” access and you can switch to “recipients can view” access before you send your mail. With this update, you’ll also be able to switch to other access levels such as “anyone can edit” and “anyone in my organization can edit.

Microsoft has already started rolling out these features to all eligible users. However, as the rollout is gradual, not everyone will get them at the same time but they should arrive by the end of this month.


Was this page helpful?


Start a conversation

Google Circles And What It Doesn’T Mean For You

Google Circles and what it Doesn’t Mean for You

Next lets have a look at the code bits this Rohrweck has found – as seen above. This code was, again, found on chúng tôi and has since been taken down. What this means, first of all, is that Google does not want this code to be seen. Second, what it COULD mean is that Circles was a project in the past but is no longer, the code simply left on the page accidentally. Having built more than one rather terribly constructed webpages in the past, I can tell you firsthand that forgetting to delete some useless code is not only possible, it’s MUCH more likely than most other scenarios. What this code appears to do or appears to have done is plain: it allows you to see how your Circles-connected friends are interacting with your profile.

There’s another bit that may be connected to Circles that was tipped back in March: a project called Google Me that was supposed to appear at Google I/O 2011 but never came to fruiting. Google Me has been talked about for months before this newest false appearance, having popped up back in July of 2010 as a social gaming construct, for example. Does this tie the name Google Me to the job listing above?

Then there’s the June 13th report by the same man who found the most recent Circles code. Rohrweck describes what he’d found at that point regarding Circles to be the following:

Google Circles isn’t so much a social network, it is more of a “contact/group management” system that lets you control which information you want to share with who.

Like: Family, Friends, Coworkers, Followers and so on. That’s circles… nothing more and nothing less.

This situation is confirmed, in a sort of sideways manner, by a couple of social communications from around March of 2011. First, according to Liz Gannes of AllThingsD, a Tweet was tweeted by Tim O’Reilly in response to a report that was later sideways-denied by Google on RWW which described Circles as a

“service will offer photo, video and status message sharing. Everything users share on Circles will be shared only with the most appropriate circle of social contacts in their lives, not with all your contacts in bulk.

The tweeted response by Tim O’Reilly read “I’ve seen google circles, and it looks awesome,” but was later deleted, replaced by an email to Liz Gannes of AllThingsD that read:

“It’s not a product, per se, and it’s not a new social network. Just some research-y thinking about how you could better manage social data. Exactly what Chris said. I got fooled by the RWW story into thinking that they’d turned it into something they were going to announce. There’s no story here. Just some labs stuff.”

So what the heck does all this mean?

It means, if you ask me, that Google Circles is a name of a project that might be released in the future that furthers the social connectivity options a person has with their Google account. You’ve already got a Google account if you’ve signed up for Gmail or if you’ve ever downloaded an app from the Android Market. More than likely this will be the same account you’ll be using to move further into the world Google is preparing for you, one we’re currently only able to call Google Circles.

It’s got a nice ring to it, wouldn’t you say? I hope they keep it.

Update the detailed information about You Get What You Pay For on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!